Plumbing discussions and local services.
Discussion options
Are water-saving toilets really worth the hype?
A water-saving toilet is worth comparing on more than its advertised flush volume. The useful questions are how much water the existing toilet uses, how reliably the replacement clears the bowl, and what installation and maintenance will cost.
EPA's residential toilet guidance describes WaterSense certification for efficiency and performance. Check the exact model and configuration, not just the brand name or whether it has two buttons. Certification is useful evidence, not a promise that every installation will be trouble-free. MaP explains what its flush scores measure; they are not a substitute for checking the complete fixture and installation.
There is no universal payback period. Compare actual flushing habits and local usage-based charges, and investigate recurring clogs instead of assuming an older house needs new drain pipes. Which would matter most when choosing a replacement: flushing performance, serviceable parts, controls or the total installed cost?
For the maintenance side, see the discussion of flapper and canister toilet valves.
12 replies
The age of the house is not enough to diagnose a weak flush. First separate poor bowl clearing from a blockage farther along the drain, and check the fixture against its own setup instructions. A replacement toilet will not remove an existing obstruction.
Repeated backups, several slow fixtures or uncertainty about the drain's condition warrant a plumber's assessment. Pipe replacement or slope changes should follow an identified defect, not a general claim that old plumbing cannot work with an efficient toilet.
For a dual-flush model, check that the controls clearly identify the reduced and full flush. Use each mode as the manufacturer intends; needing a full flush for solid waste is not itself a fault.
Compare the stated volume for both modes. Two toilets described as dual-flush need not use the same amount of water. Clear controls matter when comparing models, alongside performance and parts availability.
A utility rebate can change the cost comparison, but confirm it before buying. Check eligible model numbers, application deadlines, whether approval is needed before installation, and any receipt or disposal requirements.
EPA notes that rebates are available in some areas; that does not establish eligibility or an amount for a particular household. Use the utility's current program terms, not an unnamed city's rebate quoted in a forum reply.
Do not raise the tank level above the manufacturer's setting to compensate for a weak flush. Find the instructions for the exact model and use its specified water-level mark and adjustment procedure.
For example, this TOTO installation manual directs users to the tank's marked water level; it is not a universal setting for other toilets. If correct setup does not resolve the problem, investigate the cause rather than repeatedly increasing the flush volume.
Compare gallons used, not just whether a toilet is described as low-flow. As an illustration, 100 single flushes at 1.6 gallons use 160 gallons; 100 at 1.28 gallons use 128 gallons. That is 32 gallons saved, not a promised change in a monthly bill.
Two 1.28-gallon flushes use 2.56 gallons. Whether repeated flushing erases the savings depends on the old toilet's volume and how often it happens.
Convert the usage difference using the utility's billing units and applicable water and sewer charges. Fixed charges may not change. EPA's savings calculator explains its household inputs and assumptions. Compare estimated annual savings with the net installed cost; do not treat a generic payback claim as a measured result.
Pressure-assisted is a design choice, not a guarantee against clogs. Compare the exact toilet's requirements, service parts and suitability for the bathroom rather than assuming one mechanism is always better.
Flushmate's FAQ covers compatibility, supply requirements and repair parts. Its systems are designed for compatible toilets, not a general conversion kit for a gravity-fed tank. Follow the manufacturer's servicing instructions or use a qualified technician; do not improvise repairs to a pressurized system.
A sturdier-looking valve is not automatically a suitable upgrade. Match the toilet's model number to the specified flush valve, seal and other replacement parts before ordering.
Check part numbers, availability and maintenance instructions when comparing toilets. An incompatible part can change how the fixture operates. A compatible replacement may address a worn component, but it does not establish that the toilet's design or every downstream drain problem has been improved.
Fit belongs in the buying comparison too: confirm the rough-in and required clearances against the selected model's installation drawing, then consider bowl shape, seat height and access for maintenance.
Check the existing flange and floor condition before treating the job as a straightforward replacement. If those details need repair, include that work in the quote. A lower advertised flush volume or a more expensive brand does not answer these installation questions.
Check for a leak before attributing a high bill to flush volume. EPA's leak guidance describes adding food coloring to a toilet tank: color appearing in the bowl within ten minutes indicates a leak. Flush promptly afterward to avoid staining.
A running toilet, damp supply connection or water around the base needs attention even if the fixture carries an efficiency label. Use the model's repair instructions or a plumber when the cause is unclear, and compare subsequent usage rather than assuming a replacement will solve every source of water loss.
MaP scores stop at 1,000 grams, so there's no higher score to hunt for. I'd compare the exact models in the MaP database, then check flush volume, fit and replacement-part availability. A good test result is useful, but it won't fix a blocked drain or tell you everything about how a toilet behaves in your bathroom.
I'd look beyond the biggest number, too. Bowl cleaning, noise and reliable parts matter in daily use. With a dual-flush model, check reviews that distinguish the full flush for solids from the reduced flush for liquids.
If you're replacing several toilets, trying one first gives you a chance to see how that model works in your house before committing to the rest. Does anyone here have a model number they'd recommend, rather than just a brand name?
I’d compare each model’s flush-performance rating with its estimated annual water use. A toilet that looks efficient on paper but needs frequent second flushes may not save much in practice. It’s also worth checking whether the rating says anything about clog resistance, or if it’s based only on a controlled test. And as others mentioned, older or restricted drain lines can make even a decent low-flow toilet seem like the problem.
Find a local plumber.
Loading local plumbers…