Plumbing discussions and local services.

are water-saving toilets really worth the hype?

622 replies 93.1 K views
 
11 posts

I get where you’re coming from, but I think the “worth it” factor is a lot more subjective than people admit. I’ve worked on plenty of homes where folks swapped to high-end Toto or Kohler models and still had issues - not always clogs, but weird leaks or finicky flush buttons that don’t hold up over time. Sometimes the tech just adds more things to break.

Honestly, if your plumbing is old or there’s buildup in the lines, even the fanciest toilet won’t fix that. You might be better off spending money on getting your pipes cleaned out first. And about water savings - if you’re not in a drought-prone area or paying crazy water rates, the payback can be pretty slow.

I’ve also seen some cheaper single-flush models (like American Standard Cadet) do just fine for less money, especially if you’re not dealing with a house full of teenagers. The “hype” is real for some people, but it’s not a one-size-fits-all solution. Sometimes simple just works better.


Reply
collector22
14 posts

Honestly, if your plumbing is old or there’s buildup in the lines, even the fanciest toilet won’t fix that.

That hits the nail on the head. I remember helping swap out a “smart” dual-flush for a client who thought it’d solve all their problems - turns out, their 1960s pipes were the real culprit. The new toilet just highlighted how slow everything drained. It was like putting a turbo engine in a car with flat tires.

I’ll admit, some of those high-end models look cool and have buttons that make you feel like you’re launching a spaceship... but when they start acting up, it’s not so fun. Had one where the flush button stuck every other week - felt like I was fixing a remote control more than a toilet.

Honestly, unless you’re really chasing water savings or live somewhere with strict codes, sometimes sticking with a solid, basic model is just less headache. Less to break, easier to fix, and your wallet won’t cry as much if something goes sideways.


Reply
ryancarpenter468
3 posts

Honestly, I’ve seen some of those “water-saving” toilets do more harm than good if the pipes can’t keep up. Folks think they’re saving water, but then they end up double-flushing half the time because there’s not enough oomph to clear things out. That’s not exactly a win for the water bill - or your patience.

Had a call once where someone installed a fancy touchless flush model in an old bungalow. Looked slick, but every time you walked past it, it’d go off like it was haunted. Combine that with slow drains and... well, you get the picture. Sometimes it’s just better to have a reliable lever and a tank that actually does its job.

I do get why people want to upgrade though - some of those new models are pretty cool tech-wise. But if you’re dealing with ancient pipes or mineral buildup, it’s like putting lipstick on a pig. Ever tried snaking out 60-year-old cast iron after a “low flow” toilet clogged it up? Not fun.

Curious if anyone’s actually seen their water bill drop after switching? Or is it just trading one headache for another?


Reply
16 posts

Yeah, I've run into the same issues. Those low-flow toilets are hit or miss, especially in older places with narrow or corroded pipes. People think they're saving water, but if you're flushing twice or grabbing the plunger every other week, it defeats the purpose. I’ve seen a few newer buildings where the water bill actually went down, but that's usually because the plumbing was designed for those fixtures from the start.

Touchless models are cool in theory, but the sensors can be finicky. One place I worked on had the thing flushing every time the cat walked by. Not exactly efficient.

Honestly, unless your plumbing is up to date, sometimes sticking with a regular toilet just makes life easier. Upgrades are great, but only if the rest of the system can handle it. Otherwise, you’re just asking for more service calls and headaches.


Reply
beekeeper49
10 posts

Yeah, I hear you. I’ve lost count of how many times I’ve had to pull a low-flow toilet and snake the line because it just couldn’t handle normal use. If your pipes are old or narrow, it’s just asking for trouble. Sometimes “saving water” means wasting time and money on repairs. Touchless is neat until it starts flushing at random - seen that more than once. If your plumbing’s not up to date, I’d stick with what works.


Reply

Join the conversation

Share your experience or ask a follow-up question.

Scroll to Top