Notifications
Clear all

Touchless taps and other faucet surprises

556 Posts
527 Users
0 Reactions
20.1 K Views
Posts: 12
(@danielj32)
Active Member
Joined:

I get where you’re coming from on the battery issue—one more thing to maintain is never appealing. But I’d push back a bit on the “old-school is better” idea, especially from an efficiency standpoint:

- Touchless taps can actually save water, since they only run when you need them. That’s a big deal if you’re trying to cut down on waste.
- Some newer models are hardwired, so you’re not stuck swapping batteries all the time. They do take a bit more effort to install, but it’s a one-and-done thing.
- I’ve noticed with my own faucet that a new aerator made a huge difference, but it didn’t solve everything—still had leaks and drips that wasted water over time.

I guess it depends on your priorities. If simplicity is key, sticking with what works makes sense. But if you’re looking at the bigger picture—like water conservation and hands-free hygiene—touchless has some real upsides. Just my two cents...


Reply
emilycamper
Posts: 5
(@emilycamper)
Active Member
Joined:

Honestly, I used to be all about the old-school faucets—less to go wrong, right? But after dealing with tenants who leave taps running (don’t ask me how), the touchless ones started looking pretty good. The hardwired models are a game changer, though I’ll admit, getting them installed was a bit of a pain. Still, way fewer calls about leaks or stuck handles now. Guess it’s one of those “pay now or pay later” situations...


Reply
nickriver650
Posts: 8
(@nickriver650)
Active Member
Joined:

I get where you’re coming from—old-school faucets are definitely simpler, but honestly, I’ve seen more headaches with them than people expect. Had a call last winter where a handle snapped clean off because someone tried to force it shut (frozen pipes, go figure). Swapped it for a touchless model and haven’t heard a peep since. The upfront hassle with wiring is real, but the long-term payoff in fewer emergencies is worth it, at least from my end. Still, I do worry about sensor failures down the line... nothing’s perfect, right?


Reply
skater90
Posts: 10
(@skater90)
Active Member
Joined:

Yeah, I’ve seen similar situations—old handles can be a pain, especially with corrosion or when pipes freeze up. Touchless models do cut down on those mechanical failures, but you’re right about sensors. I’ve had a couple calls where the sensor got blocked by grime or just stopped responding. Batteries dying is another one people forget about. Still, fewer leaks and busted handles overall. Just gotta pick your battles, I guess.


Reply
sam_martin
Posts: 5
(@sam_martin)
Active Member
Joined:

Honestly, I get the appeal of touchless taps for convenience and fewer moving parts, but I’m not totally sold on them being the best long-term solution. The sensor issues you mentioned are a real headache, especially in busy kitchens or bathrooms where people don’t always clean around the base. Plus, battery waste is something that bugs me—swapping out AAAs every few months just doesn’t feel great from a sustainability angle.

I’ve actually had more luck with simple lever handles made from decent materials. They’re easy to fix, rarely break if you keep up with basic maintenance, and don’t rely on electronics or batteries. Maybe it’s just me, but sometimes old-school tech wins out for durability and environmental impact. Touchless is cool, but I’m not convinced it’s always the greener or more reliable choice in the long run.


Reply
Page 92 / 112
Share:
Scroll to Top