Notifications
Clear all

are water-saving toilets really worth the hype?

622 Posts
558 Users
0 Reactions
86 K Views
gingermentor
Posts: 17
(@gingermentor)
Active Member
Joined:

- Had a similar situation after swapping to a dual-flush model. Thought I was being clever, but a year in, the flapper started leaking and I didn’t notice until the water bill crept up.
- Totally agree with this:

“people focus on the new gadgets or upgrades, but overlook the ‘boring’ stuff like gaskets and valves.”
The little things are what get you.
- I check under every sink and behind the toilet every couple months now. Found a slow drip once that probably saved me hundreds in drywall repairs.
- Water-saving toilets are fine, but if your supply line or wax ring is shot, you’re still losing money. Maintenance > upgrades most of the time.
- Marketing always makes it sound like you’ll cut your bill in half. In reality, it’s more like a few bucks unless you’ve got a big household.
- Not saying don’t upgrade, just don’t expect miracles if you’re not keeping an eye on everything else too. Sometimes old-school habits beat fancy tech.


Reply
wleaf85
Posts: 8
(@wleaf85)
Active Member
Joined:

Had a call last winter where a guy swapped to a fancy low-flow toilet, but ignored the old shutoff valve. Valve started seeping, and by the time he noticed, his basement carpet was toast. I get the appeal of new tech, but honestly, I’ve seen more damage from neglected seals and supply lines than from “wasting” a bit of water with an older toilet. Water-saving models are fine if you stay on top of the basics, but they’re not magic. Sometimes it’s the stuff you can’t see that’ll bite you...


Reply
baking_steven
Posts: 22
(@baking_steven)
Eminent Member
Joined:

I totally get what you’re saying about the “stuff you can’t see.” When we moved in last year, I was all about swapping out the old toilets for those dual-flush ones. They look slick and the water bill did drop a bit, but I had no clue about the shutoff valves or supply lines until my dad pointed out a tiny drip under the tank. Turns out, the old valve was barely hanging on. If he hadn’t caught it, I probably would’ve ended up with a soggy bathroom floor.

I do like the water-saving part, but honestly, I feel like the hype skips over the boring (but important) stuff like making sure all the connections are solid.

“Water-saving models are fine if you stay on top of the basics, but they’re not magic.”
Couldn’t agree more. The new tech is cool, but it’s not a fix-all. If anything, it just means you gotta pay even more attention to the little things you’d never think about.


Reply
sculptor311022
Posts: 6
(@sculptor311022)
Active Member
Joined:

I get where you’re coming from, but honestly, I think the water-saving toilets are a bit overhyped. I swapped mine out too, and yeah, the water bill dipped a little, but not as much as I expected. Plus, I’ve had to unclog it way more often than the old one. Sometimes it feels like you trade one problem for another. Maybe it’s just my luck, but I kinda miss the old-school tanks that just worked and didn’t need so much fiddling around.


Reply
history191
Posts: 20
(@history191)
Eminent Member
Joined:

“Plus, I’ve had to unclog it way more often than the old one.”

Had a similar concern but found a model with a stronger flush that’s actually solved that issue for us. Might be worth checking if your setup just isn’t a good fit? Some of the early models really did have clog problems, but newer ones seem better. I do miss the simplicity of the old tanks sometimes, though.


Reply
Page 98 / 125
Share:
Scroll to Top