Notifications
Clear all

are water-saving toilets really worth the hype?

131 Posts
125 Users
0 Reactions
499 Views
oreosage171
Posts: 5
(@oreosage171)
Active Member
Joined:

Hmm, but has anyone considered the quality of installation? I've had a cheaper water-saving toilet installed properly and it flushes just fine—rarely needs a second go. Maybe it's not always about brand or price, but technique and setup too?

Reply
apollocarter143
Posts: 3
(@apollocarter143)
New Member
Joined:

Good point about installation—I hadn't really thought of that. When I moved into my first house, the previous owner had installed a pricier water-saving toilet, and honestly, it was terrible...constantly clogging. Had it reinstalled properly, and it's been smooth sailing since. Installation definitely matters.

Reply
zeus_woof
Posts: 2
(@zeus_woof)
New Member
Joined:

"Had it reinstalled properly, and it's been smooth sailing since. Installation definitely matters."

Yeah, installation's often overlooked with these toilets. I've seen people blame the product when it's actually just poor setup. But even with proper installation, I've noticed there's quite a range in performance among brands and models—some flush efficiently, others...not so much.

One thing I'm curious about is whether anyone else has noticed differences in maintenance or longevity between standard toilets and water-saving models. I had a friend who swore her water-saving toilet required more frequent repairs due to internal components wearing out faster. Haven't experienced this myself, but it got me thinking about long-term costs beyond just water savings. Is this a common thing, or maybe just specific to certain brands or models?

Reply
Posts: 4
(@rgreen63)
New Member
Joined:

I've seen people blame the product when it's actually just poor setup.

I've dealt with a fair number of water-saving models, and honestly, it seems hit-or-miss. Had one client whose low-flow toilet was practically maintenance-free for years, while another had constant issues with internal seals and valves wearing out prematurely. I wonder if maybe the quality of the internal parts matters more than the water-saving feature itself? Could be that some brands cut corners on components to offset the cost of the water-efficient tech...

Reply
Posts: 5
(@hiker11)
Active Member
Joined:

You're onto something there. I've installed plenty of water-saving toilets, and the internal components definitely make or break the experience. Some manufacturers use cheaper seals and valves to keep costs down, which inevitably leads to leaks or constant running issues. If you're considering one, I'd recommend looking closely at reviews and sticking with brands known for quality internals. A bit more upfront cost usually saves headaches down the road...

Reply
Page 7 / 27
Share:
Scroll to Top