"I've had a dual-flush Toto for a year now...haven't really noticed much difference tbh."
Yeah, the savings per flush are pretty small, so unless you've got a big family or high water rates, it might not be noticeable month-to-month. Have you checked your yearly usage comparison? Curious if anyone's seen long-term savings...
I've tracked mine pretty closely over the past couple years, and the savings do add up—but slowly. It's not gonna slash your bill overnight, but combined with other water-saving fixtures, it makes a noticeable dent long-term. Worth it environmentally either way, imo.
I've been a bit skeptical about water-saving toilets myself, having installed them in several rental properties over the years. Initially, I wasn't convinced they'd make any real difference, financially or environmentally, considering the upfront costs and the hassle of switching fixtures. But after tracking water usage across multiple units, I've seen similar results to yours—modest but steady savings over time.
Admittedly, tenants rarely notice the difference on their monthly bills right away, and I do get occasional complaints about flushing power or needing multiple flushes. So, the savings aren't always as straightforward as manufacturers like to claim. However, when combined with other water-efficient fixtures (low-flow showerheads, aerated faucets, etc.), the cumulative impact becomes more noticeable. It's a slow burn rather than an instant win.
From an environmental standpoint though, it's hard to argue against them. Even if you're not seeing huge financial gains immediately, you're still reducing overall water consumption significantly in the long run. And considering how strained our water resources have become in recent years, every little bit counts.
I appreciate your balanced view on this—it's refreshing to see someone acknowledge both the pros and cons rather than jumping on hype trains blindly. Your experience mirrors mine closely: modest financial payoff but worthwhile environmental benefits.
Your experience pretty much matches mine. The savings aren't huge upfront, but they do add up over time, especially when paired with other fixtures. I've also had tenants complain about flushing issues occasionally, but usually a quick adjustment or choosing a better model helps. Like you said, environmentally it's a no-brainer—every drop counts these days. Glad to see someone else looking at this realistically instead of just buying into marketing hype.
I've had similar experiences myself. Initially, I was skeptical about water-saving toilets because of concerns around flushing efficiency and potential plumbing issues. After installing a reputable model, though, I've noticed consistent savings on my water bill—nothing dramatic each month, but definitely noticeable over the year. One thing I'd recommend is regular maintenance checks; small adjustments or replacements of worn parts can prevent bigger issues down the line. Environmentally speaking, it's reassuring to know I'm doing my part, even if the savings aren't massive upfront.
