Notifications
Clear all

are water-saving toilets really worth the hype?

347 Posts
324 Users
0 Reactions
1,771 Views
tobyscott285
Posts: 5
(@tobyscott285)
Active Member
Joined:

Honestly, pressure-assisted toilets can be a bit tricky though... I've seen cases where older pipes or fittings just couldn't handle the sudden burst of water and pressure. Had one job recently where we installed a pressure-assisted model, thinking it'd solve clog issues, but ended up dealing with leaks from older joints. I'd definitely recommend getting your plumbing checked first—especially in older homes—before jumping to high-pressure models. Just my two cents from experience.

Reply
Posts: 7
(@pets_mark)
Active Member
Joined:

"I'd definitely recommend getting your plumbing checked first—especially in older homes—before jumping to high-pressure models."

Couldn't agree more with this. A few years back, I swapped out a couple of toilets in one of my older rental properties for those water-saving models. Thought I was being smart and eco-friendly, right? Well... turns out the plumbing was ancient enough that the reduced water flow wasn't strong enough to clear the lines properly. Ended up with tenants calling me every other week about clogs and backups—talk about unintended consequences.

Eventually, after a plumber's visit (and a not-so-cheap bill), we realized the pipes needed an overhaul before any modern toilet could do its job effectively. Lesson learned: water-saving toilets can be great, but they're definitely not a one-size-fits-all solution. Always pays to check what's behind the walls first, especially if your place has some history behind it.

Reply
duke_frost
Posts: 3
(@duke_frost)
New Member
Joined:

"Ended up with tenants calling me every other week about clogs and backups—talk about unintended consequences."

Yeah, been there myself. Did you end up sticking with water-saving models after the plumbing overhaul, or did you switch back to standard toilets? I'm considering upgrading a couple units, but honestly, stories like yours make me hesitate... wondering if it's safer to just stick with traditional models in older buildings.

Reply
Posts: 4
(@mfluffy32)
New Member
Joined:

I've dealt with similar headaches myself—older plumbing systems can be pretty unforgiving with low-flow toilets. One thing I've noticed is that not all water-saving models are created equal; some brands handle waste better than others, especially those with pressure-assisted flushes. Did you happen to check if your building's drain lines were properly sloped or vented? Sometimes the issue isn't just the toilet itself but how well the existing plumbing can handle reduced water flow...

Reply
Posts: 4
(@spirituality419)
New Member
Joined:

"Sometimes the issue isn't just the toilet itself but how well the existing plumbing can handle reduced water flow..."

That's a fair point, but honestly, even with decent plumbing, I've found low-flow toilets to be more trouble than they're worth. A few years back, I swapped out my old toilet for one of those highly-rated water-saving models—pressure-assisted and all—and it still struggled with anything beyond basic use. Had a plumber friend check everything out, and he said the lines were fine, properly sloped and vented. Turns out, some older homes just weren't built with these newer fixtures in mind.

Ended up switching back to a standard flush model after about six months of frustration. Sure, my water bill went up slightly, but the peace of mind was worth every penny. I'm all for saving water, but sometimes practicality has to win out over hype...

Reply
Page 25 / 70
Share:
Scroll to Top