Notifications
Clear all

are water-saving toilets really worth the hype?

347 Posts
324 Users
0 Reactions
1,770 Views
Posts: 5
(@zeuswriter)
Active Member
Joined:

Yeah, good point about the downstream pipes. I've seen cases where homeowners upgraded to high-efficiency toilets and still had issues because the old cast iron lines were partially clogged or corroded. Definitely worth inspecting the plumbing system as a whole before blaming the toilet itself.

Reply
kexplorer83
Posts: 10
(@kexplorer83)
Active Member
Joined:

"Definitely worth inspecting the plumbing system as a whole before blaming the toilet itself."

Yeah, totally agree with this. When I switched to a water-saving toilet, I thought I'd solved all my plumbing woes... but nope, still had issues. Turns out the old pipes were the real culprit. If you're thinking about upgrading, here's what I'd recommend from experience:

1. Check your pipes first—especially if they're older cast iron or galvanized steel. Corrosion and buildup can really mess things up, no matter how fancy your new toilet is.
2. If you find issues, consider budgeting for pipe repairs or replacements before investing in a high-efficiency toilet. Otherwise, you're just putting a band-aid on a bigger problem.
3. Once your plumbing is sorted, then go for the water-saving toilet. It'll actually do its job properly, and you'll see the savings on your water bill.

Honestly, I learned this the hard way... wish I'd known sooner, would've saved me some headaches (and cash).

Reply
Posts: 4
(@river_quantum)
New Member
Joined:

I went through something similar when we upgraded our bathroom a couple years back. I figured swapping out the old toilet for a water-saving one would be a quick fix to lower our water bills and solve some annoying flush issues. Nope... not that simple.

Turns out, our house still had original plumbing from the 60s—galvanized pipes that were pretty much rusted shut in some spots. So even after getting this sleek, efficient toilet installed, we still had slow drains and weak flushes. I was scratching my head thinking, "Did I seriously just spend money on this thing for nothing?"

Eventually, after some digging around (literally, had to open up a wall... fun times), we realized the pipes were a disaster. Replacing them wasn't cheap or easy, but once those rusty old pipes were swapped out for modern PVC, it was like night and day. The water-saving toilet finally started doing its job properly. Flushes were quick, quiet, and effective, and yeah, we did notice the water bill drop slightly.

But honestly, the toilet itself wasn't the magic bullet. It's more like part of a bigger puzzle. If your plumbing is outdated or in rough shape, you're just not gonna see the full benefits of a high-efficiency toilet until you tackle those underlying issues first. It's kinda like putting premium tires on an old car with a busted suspension—sure, you'll see some improvement, but you're still gonna feel every bump in the road.

So yeah, totally agree with checking the plumbing first... definitely wish I'd known that before diving into my bathroom reno headfirst. Would've saved me some frustration (and drywall repairs). But hey, live and learn, right?

Reply
Posts: 8
(@hunterfire725)
Active Member
Joined:

I get your point about plumbing being a big factor, but honestly, even with decent plumbing, I've seen mixed results from water-saving toilets. Sometimes the reduced water volume just doesn't clear things as effectively, meaning you end up flushing twice anyway. Kinda defeats the purpose, right? I think they're great in theory, but in practice, it depends a lot on the specific model and how it's used day-to-day.

Reply
Posts: 6
(@emilyp34)
Active Member
Joined:

Yeah, I've noticed the same thing—some models just don't cut it. Have you tried ones with a pressure-assist system? They seem to handle things better without needing that dreaded second flush...

Reply
Page 16 / 70
Share:
Scroll to Top