Notifications
Clear all

are water-saving toilets really worth the hype?

447 Posts
411 Users
0 Reactions
3,226 Views
cherylbrown270
Posts: 7
(@cherylbrown270)
Active Member
Joined:

Interesting points here, and I mostly agree—quality usually does pay off. But I'm curious, has anyone else noticed that even some pricier water-saving toilets can be a bit finicky at first? I've installed quite a few, and while they're generally reliable once set up properly, they sometimes need a bit of tweaking to get the flush just right.

"Stick with quality, follow proper install steps, and you'll dodge most headaches."

Definitely true, but I'd add that it's also about matching the toilet to your home's plumbing. I've seen cases where a high-end model didn't perform well simply because it wasn't suited to older pipes or lower water pressure. So it's not always just about price or brand—sometimes it's about compatibility too.

And speaking of headaches... anyone else ever had to explain to a homeowner why their fancy new toilet needs "fine-tuning"? Always an interesting conversation...

Reply
charlie_nebula
Posts: 6
(@charlie_nebula)
Active Member
Joined:

Yeah, you're definitely onto something about compatibility. When we upgraded to a water-saving toilet last year, I thought we'd done our homework—good brand, great reviews, the whole deal. But our house has pretty old plumbing, and the first couple weeks were... let's just say "interesting." The flush was weak, and we had some clogging issues at first. Had to call the plumber back to make some adjustments, and even then, it took a bit of trial and error before everything ran smoothly.

I agree quality matters, but it's not always a guarantee. Sometimes even the best models need that extra bit of tweaking or adjustment to fit your home's specific setup. And honestly, it's not something most people think about until they're knee-deep in troubleshooting mode. Still, now that it's all sorted out, I'm happy with the switch—we've definitely noticed lower water bills and it feels good knowing we're wasting less water overall. Just wish I'd known going in that "plug-and-play" isn't always reality with these things...

Reply
gardening777
Posts: 6
(@gardening777)
Active Member
Joined:

Interesting points about compatibility—makes me wonder if the savings really balance out the upfront hassle and plumber costs. Did you find that your water bill dropped enough to offset those initial headaches? I've been eyeing a few models myself, but our plumbing isn't exactly new either, and I'm not thrilled about the idea of multiple plumber visits eating into any potential savings.

Also curious if anyone's noticed differences between brands or models in terms of how much tweaking they need. Is it mostly trial-and-error across the board, or are some brands genuinely easier to integrate with older setups? I mean, saving water sounds great and all, but if I'm spending weekends plunging toilets or waiting around for plumbers... is it really worth it in the end?

Reply
Posts: 3
(@fitness8581590)
New Member
Joined:

I've had similar experiences with older plumbing setups, and yeah, the initial hassle can be a bit much. But honestly, after installing water-saving toilets in a couple of older rental units, the water bills did noticeably drop after a few months. I'd suggest looking at brands known for wider trapways—less clogging issues overall and fewer plumber visits.

Reply
sthompson94
Posts: 9
(@sthompson94)
Active Member
Joined:

Totally agree on the wider trapways—makes a huge difference. If you're installing yourself, just make sure you get a good wax ring seal and level it properly. Nothing worse than a wobbly toilet...trust me, learned that the hard way, lol.

Reply
Page 11 / 90
Share:
Scroll to Top