Notifications
Clear all

are water-saving toilets really worth the hype?

622 Posts
558 Users
0 Reactions
75.2 K Views
coffee454
Posts: 15
(@coffee454)
Active Member
Joined:

I get where you’re coming from about the pipes, but I’ve gotta say, in my experience, the toilet itself can make a bigger difference than people think. Here’s what I’ve noticed after swapping out a couple of old-school toilets for water-savers in our 70s-era place:

- Even with older plumbing, the newer toilets just seem to push waste through better. Maybe it’s the design of the trapway or the way they flush, but I haven’t had more clogs than before.
- The dual-flush models are hit or miss. Some brands really do struggle with solids, but others (like Toto or American Standard) have been surprisingly reliable for us.
- We did have some slow drains before, but honestly, that was more about tree roots in the yard than anything inside. Once we cleared those out, everything worked fine—even with the low-flow toilets.

Not saying plumbing isn’t a factor, but sometimes folks blame the pipes when it’s actually just a cheap or poorly designed toilet. If you go for a reputable brand and maybe spend a little more upfront, you might avoid a lot of headaches.

One thing I will say: if you’ve got ancient cast iron pipes with tons of buildup, nothing’s gonna help until you get those cleaned out. But for most folks with halfway decent plumbing, water-saving toilets are worth it—especially when you see your water bill drop.

Just my two cents from messing around with this stuff over the years...


Reply
trader27
Posts: 9
(@trader27)
Active Member
Joined:

- Seen the same thing—cheap toilets are usually the culprit, not the pipes.
- Dual-flush can be hit or miss, totally agree there.
- One thing I’ve noticed: some folks swap to water-savers but keep using old wax rings or don’t level the base, and then blame the toilet for leaks or rocking.
- Curious, did you notice any difference in noise level with the new models? Some of the newer ones seem louder to me, especially at night...


Reply
Posts: 19
(@margaretw26)
Eminent Member
Joined:

Noise level—yeah, that’s a thing. I swapped out my old clunker for a fancy water-saver last year, and now it sounds like a jet engine at 2am. My dog won’t even go near the bathroom after dark. But hey, at least the floor’s dry... once I figured out the wax ring trick you mentioned. Honestly, half the time it’s not the toilet’s fault, it’s whoever installed it (sometimes me, oops). Still, I’ll take a little noise over a leaky mess any day.


Reply
mindfulness955
Posts: 12
(@mindfulness955)
Active Member
Joined:

I had the same issue with the noise, honestly. The first time I flushed it at night, I thought something was wrong with the pipes. If you’re handy, you can sometimes swap out the fill valve for a quieter model—Fluidmaster makes a “quiet” version that helped in my case. As for installation, yeah... I learned the hard way about getting the wax ring lined up right. No leaks now, but I do miss how solid the old toilets felt. Water savings are real though—my bill dropped a bit, so I guess it’s a tradeoff.


Reply
Posts: 9
(@barbaraecho786)
Active Member
Joined:

- Noticed the same thing with the wax ring—lining it up is way trickier than YouTube makes it look.
- Curious, did you have to double-flush more with the new toilet? Some of these water-savers seem to need a second go, which kinda defeats the purpose.
- Also, any issues with clogs since switching? I’ve seen mixed reviews on that front...


Reply
Page 101 / 125
Share:
Scroll to Top