Notifications
Clear all

When is it time to swap out old pipes?

162 Posts
158 Users
0 Reactions
1,503 Views
karenriver187
Posts: 13
(@karenriver187)
Active Member
Joined:

Totally get where you’re coming from, but patching isn’t always a lost cause—sometimes it’s just smart budgeting. Here’s the thing: not every old pipe is secretly plotting to flood your kitchen at 2am. If you’re dealing with, say, a tiny pinhole leak in a copper line that otherwise looks solid, a proper patch (and yeah, I mean the right materials, not duct tape and a prayer) can buy you years.

Here’s my quick-and-dirty checklist before going full pipe swap:

1. Spot check for corrosion or weird smells—if the water’s funky or the pipes look like they’ve seen better centuries, yeah, swap ‘em.
2. Map out the problem areas. One isolated leak? Patch might be fine. Multiple leaks on different runs? Time to rethink.
3. Consider access—if fixing one spot means tearing up three walls, maybe just go for a bigger upgrade.

I’m all for eco-friendly choices too, but sometimes “replace everything” means a lot of perfectly good pipe ends up in the landfill. Just depends how wild your plumbing’s acting, honestly...


Reply
Posts: 3
(@charlies45)
Active Member
Joined:

Honestly, I’m with you on not tossing out pipes just because they’re “old.” My last house had copper lines from the 70s—patched a couple pinholes and they held up fine for years. I do get a little twitchy about lead or galvanized, though. If it’s just a small leak and the rest looks solid, patching feels way less wasteful. Plus, less demo means less mess (and less drywall dust in my coffee). Sometimes “replace everything” is overkill, especially if you’re trying to keep stuff out of the landfill.


Reply
josephg31
Posts: 4
(@josephg31)
New Member
Joined:

Sometimes “replace everything” is overkill, especially if you’re trying to keep stuff out of the landfill.

That’s exactly how I feel—why rip out perfectly good copper just because it’s old? I patched a leak in my 60s-era kitchen line last year and it’s been solid since. I do get nervous about lead, though. For me, it’s about balance: fix what you can, replace when you really have to. Less waste, less chaos, and honestly, less money down the drain.


Reply
aspenscott497
Posts: 11
(@aspenscott497)
Active Member
Joined:

For me, it’s about balance: fix what you can, replace when you really have to.

Totally get where you’re coming from. I had the same debate with myself when I moved in—my inspector flagged some old copper but said it was still in good shape. I’ve patched a pinhole or two, but honestly, it feels wasteful to gut it all just because it’s not shiny and new. Lead would freak me out too, but as long as it’s copper and not showing green corrosion everywhere, I’m with you on the “fix first” approach. Plus, my wallet appreciates it...


Reply
foodie37
Posts: 4
(@foodie37)
New Member
Joined:

Yeah, I hear you on the “not shiny and new” thing—it’s easy to get caught up thinking everything old needs to go, but copper’s tough stuff. I’ve kept mine going with a few repairs and regular checks. If it’s not leaking or corroded, why toss it? No shame in patching, especially when it saves some cash and keeps stuff out of the landfill. Just keep an eye on those joints, and maybe flush things out once in a while if you’re worried about buildup.


Reply
Page 18 / 33
Share:
Scroll to Top