Notifications
Clear all

Choosing between in-kitchen and underground grease traps—what would you do?

515 Posts
484 Users
0 Reactions
52.8 K Views
Posts: 9
(@adventure_amanda)
Active Member
Joined:

I totally get the “out of sight, out of mind” thing. I’ve had both setups over the years, and honestly, I’m still not sure there’s a perfect answer. You nailed it with this:

But for me, I’d rather have the gross stuff where I can see it and deal with it before it turns into a science project... learned that lesson the hard way with a compost bin once.

That’s basically my philosophy too. I’d rather deal with a little mess now than a disaster later. The under-sink trap is gross, but at least you know when it needs attention. I had an underground one at my last place, and it was fine for a while... until it wasn’t. The first sign of trouble was a patch of grass that started growing like crazy right above the hatch. Turns out, the trap was overflowing and leaking into the yard. Not fun, and definitely not cheap to fix.

From an eco perspective, I think you’re spot on—maintenance is everything. Grease in the wrong place is a nightmare for the whole system, not just your pipes. I try to scrape as much as possible into the compost or trash before anything hits the sink, but there’s always some that gets through.

One thing I’ve wondered: has anyone tried setting a recurring calendar reminder for cleaning? I’m organized about some things, but I know myself—if it’s not in my face, I’ll forget. Maybe that’s the real deciding factor: are you the type who’ll actually stick to a schedule for something you can’t see? If not, under-sink is probably safer.

Anyway, I’d rather deal with a little stink under the sink than a big bill from a plumber. At least with the under-sink trap, you know what you’re dealing with.


Reply
mythology_kevin
Posts: 15
(@mythology_kevin)
Active Member
Joined:

I get the appeal of having the mess where you can see it, but I’m not convinced under-sink traps are always the safer bet. They’re easier to check, sure, but in my experience, they also fill up much faster and need more frequent attention. Plus, if you’ve got a small kitchen, that space under the sink is already prime real estate for storage—having a bulky trap there can be a pain.

At least with the under-sink trap, you know what you’re dealing with.

That’s true, but I’ve seen a few cases where people *thought* they were keeping up with it, only to find out the trap had been leaking slowly for ages. Water damage under the sink isn’t cheap either, especially if it goes unnoticed for a while. With underground traps, you do have to be more disciplined about maintenance (calendar reminders are a smart idea), but they usually have a bigger capacity and keep the smells out of your living space.

I guess it comes down to whether you trust yourself to stick to a schedule. For folks who are good with routines, underground might actually be less hassle in the long run.


Reply
nickj28
Posts: 3
(@nickj28)
New Member
Joined:

You’re spot on about under-sink traps being a mixed bag. I’ve seen plenty of kitchens where the trap is crammed in with cleaning supplies and gets neglected, or someone bumps it and loosens a fitting. That slow leak you mentioned? Happens more than folks realize, especially if the install wasn’t tight to begin with. On the flip side, underground traps really do need a solid maintenance routine—out of sight, out of mind is a real risk. But if you’re organized and don’t mind setting reminders, they can be less intrusive and handle more volume. There’s no perfect answer, but you’re thinking about all the right factors.


Reply
Posts: 12
(@peanutchessplayer)
Active Member
Joined:

I hear you on the “out of sight, out of mind” thing with underground traps.

But if you’re organized and don’t mind setting reminders, they can be less intrusive and handle more volume.
I tried that route once—set a reminder, promptly ignored it, and paid for it with a nasty backup. Under-sink might be a pain, but at least I can see when things are getting gross. For me, if I have to choose between a visible hassle and a hidden disaster, I’ll take the hassle every time.


Reply
camper385109
Posts: 18
(@camper385109)
Eminent Member
Joined:

Had a restaurant client once who went the underground route, thinking it’d be “set and forget.” Worked fine for about six months, then one day the kitchen floor started to flood—turns out, nobody had checked the trap in ages. Ended up costing more in cleanup and downtime than just dealing with the under-sink hassle.

I get what you’re saying about wanting to see when things are building up. With under-sink units, you can’t really ignore it—if it’s gross, you know right away. But man, some of those smaller traps fill up fast if you’ve got a busy kitchen. Ever had to empty one right in the middle of a dinner rush? Not pretty. Guess it comes down to whether you trust your team to stay on schedule or if you’d rather just deal with the mess as it comes.

Curious—has anyone here tried those newer sensors that send alerts when the trap’s full? I’ve seen them around but haven’t worked with one yet... Wondering if that’s actually useful or just another gadget that gets ignored.


Reply
Page 90 / 103
Share:
Scroll to Top