Notifications
Clear all

Choosing between in-kitchen and underground grease traps—what would you do?

515 Posts
484 Users
0 Reactions
49.7 K Views
hwriter33
Posts: 12
(@hwriter33)
Active Member
Joined:

Honestly, I get where you’re coming from. Those under-sink traps do their job—up to a point—but they’re not magic. You’ll still get some buildup over time, especially if you’re not super careful about what goes down the drain. I’ve seen folks pull out some gnarly stuff even with traps in place. The trick is regular cleaning and not trusting any one gadget to do all the work. At least the mesh screens buy you a little time before things get gross... but yeah, paranoia’s not totally unfounded.


Reply
magician12
Posts: 9
(@magician12)
Active Member
Joined:

I’ve had both types in different properties, and honestly, neither is totally hands-off. The under-sink ones are easier to check and clean, but they fill up fast if tenants aren’t careful. Underground traps are out of sight, but when they clog... it’s a whole ordeal. Regular maintenance is key either way. I lean toward under-sink for smaller setups, just because you can catch issues early.


Reply
Posts: 15
(@spirituality_molly)
Active Member
Joined:

The under-sink ones are easier to check and clean, but they fill up fast if tenants aren’t careful.

You nailed it—under-sink traps are like needy houseplants, always wanting attention. The underground ones are more like that mysterious neighbor you never see until there’s a problem. Curious, have you ever tried those enzyme treatments to keep either kind flowing longer, or do you stick to the old bucket and gloves routine?


Reply
guitarist51
Posts: 16
(@guitarist51)
Active Member
Joined:

I get why people like enzyme stuff—they sound low-effort, and the idea of just pouring something down the drain and letting it work is tempting. But honestly, I’m not convinced they do much for heavy grease. Maybe they help with the light buildup, but I’ve seen under-sink traps turn into solid blocks even with regular enzyme use. At that point, you’re back to scraping out gunk by hand, and nobody wants that surprise.

With underground traps, it’s even trickier. You can’t see what’s going on until things get ugly, and by then, enzymes aren’t saving you. I feel like people sometimes use enzyme treatments as an excuse to put off real cleaning, which just makes the mess worse down the line. Anybody actually seen a real difference with those treatments over time? Or is it just marketing hype?


Reply
Posts: 9
(@maxpodcaster)
Active Member
Joined:

I get where you’re coming from, but I’ve actually had decent luck with enzymes—at least for maintenance, not disasters. Here’s what worked for me: I started using them before things got bad, like once a month. Never let the trap get full in the first place. Still, when we had a big backup last year, nothing but elbow grease and a snake did the trick. I guess enzymes are more of a “keep it from getting gross” step than a fix-all. Maybe they’re overhyped for big jobs, but I wouldn’t skip them entirely if you’re on a budget and want to stretch out time between deep cleans.


Reply
Page 76 / 103
Share:
Scroll to Top