Notifications
Clear all

How much would you pay to fix water damage from a burst pipe?

635 Posts
595 Users
0 Reactions
21.9 K Views
Posts: 9
(@emilyanimator)
Active Member
Joined:

When we had a pipe burst in our basement, the crew ended up cutting out about two feet of drywall all around the affected area. It wasn’t just surface stuff—once water gets behind the wall, mold’s a real risk. Insurance covered some, but they pushed back on a few things, saying we should’ve caught it sooner. It’s frustrating how subjective “preventable” can be.


Reply
Posts: 4
(@tiggerarcher)
New Member
Joined:

It wasn’t just surface stuff—once water gets behind the wall, mold’s a real risk.

That’s the part people don’t always realize until it happens to them. I was on a job last month where the homeowner thought it was just a small leak, but when we opened up the wall, the insulation was soaked and there was already some black mold starting. It’s wild how fast that stuff can take hold, especially if the pipe’s been dripping for even a couple days.

Insurance companies can be tough about what’s “preventable.” In theory, you’re supposed to spot every little thing, but in reality, pipes are hidden and most folks don’t go poking around their basement walls unless there’s a puddle. I get why they have policies, but it feels like they expect you to have x-ray vision sometimes.

Cutting out two feet all around is pretty standard, though. You want to make sure you get every bit of damp material out, or you’re just asking for trouble down the line. It’s a pain, but you did the right thing getting it all cleared out.


Reply
Posts: 7
(@yoga_debbie)
Active Member
Joined:

I swear, water damage is like the ninja of home disasters—silent, sneaky, and suddenly you’re knee-deep in repairs. I’ve had tenants call about a “little damp spot” and by the time I get there, it’s a full-blown science experiment behind the drywall. Mold doesn’t mess around.

Insurance is a whole other circus. They want you to catch leaks before they even happen, but unless you’ve got Spidey-sense for plumbing, that’s just not realistic. I’ve had claims denied because apparently I should’ve known a pipe was sweating behind a finished wall. Right...

Cutting out two feet all around is my go-to too. It feels like overkill until you see what happens if you leave even a little bit of moisture—then you’re paying double six months later. Ever tried explaining to a tenant why their closet smells like a swamp? Not fun.

Curious—has anyone actually had insurance cover the full cost, or do they always find some loophole?


Reply
frodocollector
Posts: 3
(@frodocollector)
New Member
Joined:

Never had insurance cover the full tab, not once. They always seem to find a way to call it “maintenance neglect” or “pre-existing.” Even with photos and receipts, it’s like arguing with a brick wall. I’ve just started budgeting for repairs myself—less stress in the long run.


Reply
Posts: 23
(@gardening173)
Eminent Member
Joined:

I hear you on the insurance headaches. It’s wild how fast they can label something “neglect” when you’ve got all your ducks in a row. I’ve seen folks get denied for stuff like a tiny bit of old corrosion on a pipe—like, who’s checking behind their walls every week? Honestly, budgeting for repairs yourself isn’t the worst plan. At least you know what you’re getting into, and there’s no waiting around for adjusters to play detective.


Reply
Page 63 / 127
Share:
Scroll to Top