Notifications
Clear all

How much would you pay to fix water damage from a burst pipe?

873 Posts
807 Users
0 Reactions
65.5 K Views
Posts: 5
(@productivity_sophie)
Active Member
Joined:

I get the logic behind paying for a pro inspection, but honestly, $150 still feels steep if they’re just doing a quick walk-through. I’d want to see them actually check pressure, maybe run a camera if there’s any suspicion. I’ve seen people skip the crawlspace and call it good... not cool. If you’re going to pay, make sure they’re thorough—otherwise, you’re just paying for peace of mind, not real prevention.


Reply
electronics_summit
Posts: 3
(@electronics_summit)
New Member
Joined:

Honestly, $150 isn’t crazy if they’re actually doing the job right—pressure test, camera, crawlspace, the works. But yeah, if it’s just a flashlight and a clipboard, you’re basically paying for someone to tell you what you already know. I’ve seen folks skip the crawlspace too... that’s where half the problems hide. If you’re shelling out, make sure they get dirty. Otherwise, you might as well just cross your fingers and hope nothing bursts at 2am.


Reply
rachel_trekker
Posts: 10
(@rachel_trekker)
Active Member
Joined:

if it’s just a flashlight and a clipboard, you’re basically paying for someone to tell you what you already know.

I get that, but sometimes that $150 is just the “show up” fee, not even the real work. I’ve had guys come out, do a quick look around, then hit you with an extra charge for every little thing—camera’s another $75, crawlspace is “extra dirty,” so it’s more. Honestly, I’d rather pay a bit more up front and get someone who actually gives a crap about doing it right. That said, I’ve crawled under my own place before and found stuff missed by pros. Sometimes getting your hands dirty is the only way to be sure.


Reply
Posts: 1
(@racheltaylor971)
New Member
Joined:

I hear you on the “show up” fee—been burned by that too. Last year, I had a pipe burst in my crawlspace. First plumber charged $120 just to look, then wanted another $200 to run a camera, and even more for “hazard pay” because it was muddy. Ended up doing most of the cleanup myself. Pulled out soaked insulation, set up fans, and only called someone when I hit stuff I couldn’t handle. Honestly, if you’re willing to get dirty, you can save a ton, but it’s not for everyone. Sometimes the pros miss stuff you’d catch just poking around yourself.


Reply
juliea58
Posts: 4
(@juliea58)
New Member
Joined:

Man, those “hazard pay” charges crack me up. Like mud is some rare, dangerous substance. I’ve crawled through enough muddy crawlspaces to know it’s just part of the job—bring old clothes and a sense of humor. I get why folks want to save money by doing the dirty work themselves. Honestly, half the time you’re paying for someone else’s tolerance for discomfort, not just their expertise.

That said, I’ve seen people go a little too DIY and end up with mold or hidden leaks because they missed something small. It’s a gamble. If you’re detail-oriented and don’t mind getting gross, you can save a bundle. But if you’re squeamish or in over your head, sometimes it’s worth coughing up the cash for a pro—just maybe not the guy charging “mud fees.”

Funny thing is, I’ve found more lost tools and random junk under houses than actual pipe problems. Sometimes the real hazard is stepping on a rusty screwdriver someone left behind...


Reply
Page 162 / 175
Share:
Scroll to Top