Plumbing discussions and local services.

Touchless taps and other faucet surprises

555 replies
 

Join the conversation

Share your experience or ask a follow-up question.

tobydiver37

it’s wild how often the “smart” stuff ends up being more work.

I get where you’re coming from, but I’ve actually had the opposite luck with my touchless faucet (battery-powered, not hardwired). Maybe I just got a good one? Sure, changing batteries is a pain, but honestly, it’s less hassle than fixing a leaky old-school tap every few months. Plus, my kids think it’s magic - keeps them washing their hands, which is a minor miracle in itself. Sometimes the “extra work” pays off in weird ways.


Reply
literature370

“keeps them washing their hands, which is a minor miracle in itself.”

That’s actually a good point. I helped install one at my aunt’s house and her kids started washing up way more too. Didn’t expect that side effect. Still not sure I trust the sensors long-term, though...


Reply
fashion_elizabeth4989

I get where you’re coming from with the sensor skepticism. I’ve looked at those touchless faucets for a while, but I keep hesitating because I’m not convinced they’ll hold up over time - especially with kids who tend to be a bit rough on things. That said, hearing that your aunt’s kids started washing their hands more is kind of making me reconsider. If it helps with hygiene, maybe it’s worth the risk.

From a budget standpoint, though, I do worry about the cost of repairs if the sensor goes out. Some models seem to have proprietary parts or batteries that aren’t exactly cheap or easy to replace. I’ve read a few reviews where people had to swap out the whole unit after just a couple of years, which doesn’t sit well with me. On the other hand, traditional faucets can leak or break too, so maybe it’s just a different set of trade-offs.

One thing I did notice when I was researching: some brands offer manual override options in case the sensor fails. That seems like a smart feature if you’re worried about reliability. Also, if you’re handy, it might be worth looking into models with easily accessible components - just in case you need to do a quick fix yourself.

I guess there’s always going to be some risk with newer tech, but if it actually gets kids to wash their hands without constant reminders, that’s a pretty big win in my book. Still, I’d probably keep a regular faucet on standby... just in case.


Reply
jinferno85

I keep circling back to the water savings angle with these touchless taps. I’ve read that they can cut down on wasted water, especially if you’ve got kids who tend to leave the faucet running while they’re distracted. But I’m not totally sure how much of a difference it makes in real life - like, is it enough to justify the extra cost and possible headaches down the road?

Also, I wonder about the environmental impact of replacing batteries or even whole units more often. Does anyone know if there are models out there that use rechargeable batteries or have some kind of energy-saving feature? I like the idea of less water waste, but not if it means more electronic junk in a couple years.

Curious if anyone’s actually tracked their water bill before and after switching to a sensor faucet. Is it just hype, or does it add up over time?


Reply
donaldmoon858

Curious if anyone’s actually tracked their water bill before and after switching to a sensor faucet. Is it just hype, or does it add up over time?

I swapped our kitchen tap for a touchless one last year - mostly because my kids treat the sink like a water park. Honestly, the water bill dropped a bit, but not enough to pay for the faucet anytime soon. The real win is less nagging about turning off the tap.

About batteries: most models use AA’s, but I’ve seen a few pricier ones with rechargeable packs or even AC adapters. Still, you’re right - replacing batteries every 6-12 months feels wasteful. If you’re handy, some folks have rigged up USB power, but that’s not exactly plug-and-play.

Bottom line: it saves water, but not magic amounts. The convenience is nice, though.


Reply
editor29

I get the appeal of touchless, especially with messy hands or kids around, but I keep coming back to the cost vs. actual savings. If the water bill only drops a few bucks a month, it’s hard for me to justify the upfront price - especially when you factor in batteries or adapters. Has anyone tried those low-flow aerators instead? They’re dirt cheap and supposedly cut usage too, but I wonder if they’re as convenient or just annoying.


Reply
josethinker896

Touchless is cool tech, but I totally get what you mean about the price tag. Here’s what I’ve noticed with low-flow aerators:

- Super cheap and easy to install - literally just screw them on.
- They do cut down water use, but sometimes the flow feels a bit weak, especially if you’re trying to fill a pot or rinse stuff fast.
- Haven’t had any issues with them clogging, but I’ve heard hard water can mess them up over time.

Honestly, for most folks, the aerators are way less hassle than dealing with batteries dying in a touchless faucet. But yeah, they’re not as “fun” or convenient when your hands are covered in dough or paint.

Curious if anyone’s tried those foot pedal setups? Seems like a middle ground - no batteries, still hands-free... but maybe overkill for a regular kitchen?


Reply
nwalker55

I’ve actually seen foot pedal setups in a couple of restaurant kitchens, and honestly, they work pretty well for hands-free control without any tech headaches. The install can be a bit more involved than just swapping out an aerator, though - usually some extra plumbing under the sink. For a regular home kitchen, it might feel like overkill unless you’re cooking nonstop or really want to avoid touching handles. They’re sturdy, but you’ll probably notice your guests giving you weird looks the first time they use your sink...


Reply
golfplayer58

I get the appeal of foot pedals - no fingerprints, no worrying about raw chicken hands on the faucet. But honestly, I keep picturing myself tripping over the thing or accidentally flooding the kitchen because my dog decided to nap under the sink. Maybe that’s just me being paranoid, but I feel like there’s a reason you mostly see those in commercial kitchens where everyone’s trained up.

For my place, I’m leaning way more toward touchless taps. At least if something goes wrong, it’s usually just a battery swap or a sensor wipe, not crawling around with a wrench and a flashlight. Plus, I’ve got little nieces and nephews running around and I’d rather not introduce another “what does this button do?” hazard into the mix. Foot pedals are cool in theory, but for home use... I dunno, feels like inviting chaos under my cabinets.


Reply
sthompson94

But honestly, I keep picturing myself tripping over the thing or accidentally flooding the kitchen because my dog decided to nap under the sink.

That mental image of your dog under the sink cracked me up. I’ve seen it happen - someone’s cat once set off a foot pedal at a job I was on, and it was like Niagara Falls for about a minute before anyone noticed. Pets and plumbing gadgets don’t always mix.

I get where you’re coming from with the “inviting chaos” part. Foot pedals are awesome for keeping things hands-free, but they do add another layer of stuff that can go sideways. In commercial kitchens, you’ve got folks trained to use them, and even then, they sometimes get jammed with random food bits or someone’s shoe. At home, you’re right, it’s a lot to ask when you’ve got kids and pets roaming around.

Touchless taps are way less intimidating for most folks. If you’re handy enough to swap out batteries and give the sensor a quick clean, you’re pretty much set. The only real “gotcha” I’ve seen is if the sensor gets blocked by a dish towel or soap bottle - then you’re waving your hands around like you’re trying to land a plane until you realize what’s up.

One thing I’d mention: if you go with touchless, check how easy it is to switch to manual mode. Some models have a backup lever in case the sensor dies and you’re out of batteries. Not all do, which can be a pain if you’re mid-cooking and suddenly stuck with raw chicken hands and no water.

I guess it comes down to how much tech you want under your sink. Foot pedals are cool but can be finicky, especially with pets/kids. Touchless is less hassle for most people, just keep an eye on where you put stuff near the sensor. Either way, anything’s better than wrestling with those old twisty knobs when your hands are covered in dough...


Reply
nancyr46

Touchless taps are way less intimidating for most folks. If you’re handy enough to swap out batteries and give the sensor a quick clean, you’re pretty much set. The only real “gotcha” I’ve seen is if the sensor gets blocked by a dish towel or soap bottle - then you’re waving your hands around like you’re trying to land a plane until you realize what’s up.

That “landing a plane” bit is spot on. I can’t count how many times I’ve been elbow-deep in a leaky pipe job and caught someone in the kitchen doing interpretive dance just to get the water running. Touchless is great, but those sensors have a mind of their own sometimes.

Here’s my quick-and-dirty guide for keeping your sanity with these things:

1. Sensor Placement Matters: If you can, mount it so it’s not right next to where you hang towels or stash the soap. I’ve seen folks stick a magnetic hook for their dish rag right in front of the sensor and then wonder why the tap’s haunted.

2. Battery Check: Keep a pack of whatever batteries your model uses in the junk drawer. Trust me, nothing kills dinner prep like dead tap batteries and sticky hands.

3. Manual Override: Like you mentioned, some models have a backup lever or handle. If you’re shopping for one, look for that feature. I’ve had calls from people who thought their faucet was broken, but really, they just needed to flip it to manual mode after the batteries died.

4. Pet Patrol: If your dog’s got a habit of exploring under the sink, maybe block off that area or put down a mat that rustles when they step on it. I once saw a golden retriever turn on a foot pedal faucet and then just stare at the water like he’d invented indoor plumbing.

5. Routine Cleaning: Sensors get gunked up with splashes and fingerprints. A quick wipe every couple days keeps things working (and saves you from the “wave your hand like a wizard” routine).

I’ll say this - foot pedals are fun in theory, but unless you’re running a sandwich shop out of your kitchen, they’re probably more trouble than they’re worth at home. Touchless is easier for most folks, especially if you don’t want to crawl under the sink every time something goes sideways.

But hey, anything beats those old-school two-handle faucets that somehow always drip no matter how tight you crank them...


Reply
cherylfoodie

Funny you mention the “haunted tap” thing - last winter I got called out to a house where the kitchen faucet kept turning itself on and off. The homeowner was convinced it was electrical, but turns out, their cat had figured out that if he batted at the dish towel (which was hanging right in front of the sensor), he could get a little drinking fountain going. Took us a while to catch him in the act.

One thing I’d add: don’t trust the battery indicator lights on some of these models. I’ve seen them show “full” one day and then dead as a doornail the next. If your water pressure seems weak or the sensor’s acting up, swap the batteries before you start taking things apart. Saves a lot of cursing under the sink.

I’m still not sold on foot pedals for home kitchens either. They’re neat, but unless you’re prepping food all day, it’s just another thing to break. Touchless is definitely less hassle if you keep up with the basics.


Reply
inventor375859

Had a similar “haunted” faucet call last year, except in that case it was a toddler who’d figured out the sensor trick. Parents were convinced the thing was shorting out, but nope - just a very determined two-year-old with sticky hands and a love for running water.

I agree about the battery indicators being unreliable. I’ve seen

“full” one day and then dead as a doornail the next
more times than I can count. Swapping batteries is always my first move before I even think about pulling anything apart. Saves a lot of time (and knuckle skin).

On foot pedals, I’m with you for the most part. They’re clever, but in most homes they just add another moving part that’ll eventually need fixing. Touchless is simpler if you keep up with cleaning the sensor and changing batteries. Only exception I’ve seen is in homes where accessibility’s an issue - then foot pedals can be a real game changer. Otherwise, less is more.


Reply
snebula98

Yeah, those battery indicators are basically a coin toss. I’ve had faucets show “full” and then just quit mid-handwash - super helpful, right? Swapping batteries first is always my move too. As for foot pedals, I get the appeal for accessibility, but in most kitchens they’re just another thing to break or get gummed up with crumbs. Touchless is less hassle if you keep the sensor clean, but honestly, nothing beats a good old manual handle for reliability. Maybe I’m just old school...


Reply
hunters80

Battery indicators are a joke, honestly. I’ve lost count of how many times I’ve been called out to “fix” a touchless faucet that just needed fresh batteries, even though the light said it was fine. Sometimes I wonder if those sensors are just guessing. Had one last week - brand new batteries, still dead. Ended up being a loose wire in the housing. Not exactly confidence-inspiring.

Foot pedals are interesting, but in commercial kitchens they’re a magnet for gunk. You’d be surprised how fast flour or grease builds up in the pedal mechanism. I’ve had to take apart more than a few that were basically glued shut with old food bits. At home? I think they’re overkill unless you really need hands-free for accessibility reasons.

Touchless is great when it works, but keeping the sensor clean is key. One family I worked with had their sensor right next to the soap dispenser - bad idea. Soap splatter kept blocking it, so the water would turn on and off randomly. They switched back to a regular handle after a month.

Honestly, manual handles just don’t quit. Maybe it’s boring, but I’ve never had someone call me out because their standard faucet stopped working unless it was ancient or leaking. Less to go wrong, less to maintain… sometimes simple really is better. But hey, maybe that’s just me being skeptical after too many “smart” faucet failures.


Reply
activist56

I get where you’re coming from, but I’ve actually had a pretty solid run with touchless taps at home - at least the higher-end ones. The trick for me was hardwiring them instead of relying on batteries, which is a bit more work up front but saves a lot of hassle down the line. As for manual handles, sure, they’re reliable, but I’ve noticed in messy cooking sessions (think: raw chicken hands), not having to touch anything is a game changer. Maybe it’s just my inner germaphobe talking, but I’m willing to put up with a little extra maintenance for that convenience.


Reply
marketing_michael1455

Hardwiring is definitely the way to go if you’re serious about touchless taps. I’ve lost count of how many times I’ve been called out to swap dead batteries in those things - usually right when someone’s elbow-deep in dough or, like you said, raw chicken. Folks always swear they’ll remember to change the batteries “next time,” but life gets in the way.

I get the appeal, though. My partner’s a bit of a clean freak and swears by our sensor faucet in the kitchen. She’s convinced it’s saved us from at least a dozen foodborne illnesses. I’m not sure about that math, but I will say it makes cleanup less of a circus when your hands are covered in who-knows-what.

One thing I’ve noticed: the cheaper models can be a real pain. Sensors that don’t pick up your hands unless you wave like you’re hailing a cab, or worse, they turn on randomly and soak your shirt. The higher-end ones seem to have figured that out, but installation can be finicky if your plumbing’s older.

Funny story - installed one for my neighbor last year, and her cat figured out how to trigger it just by jumping on the counter. She came home to a minor flood and a very smug-looking feline. Lesson learned: sometimes convenience comes with surprises you didn’t bargain for.

Manual handles are still my go-to for bathrooms, though. Less that can go wrong, and honestly, I don’t mind wiping them down now and then. But for messy kitchen work? Yeah, touchless wins most days... as long as you keep an eye on those batteries (or better yet, skip ‘em entirely).


Reply
hunter_vortex

I totally get the battery headache - honestly, that’s the main thing making me hesitate about going touchless in our new kitchen. Hardwiring sounds ideal, but I keep wondering if it’s worth the hassle (and extra cost) to have an electrician run a line just for a faucet. The convenience is tempting, though. I’m a bit of a germaphobe myself, so the idea of not smearing raw chicken everywhere is pretty appealing.

That cat story cracked me up, but it also makes me wonder about “smart” features backfiring. I’ve got a dog who loves to nose around the counters... not sure I want to risk an indoor waterfall. Has anyone tried those models with manual override levers? Seems like a good compromise if the sensor acts up, but I’m skeptical about how well they actually work in practice.

Curious if anyone’s had luck with retrofitting older plumbing for hardwired models, or if it ends up being more trouble than it’s worth.


Reply
sophiewhite402

Has anyone tried those models with manual override levers? Seems like a good compromise if the sensor acts up, but I’m skeptical about how well they actually work in practice.

Honestly, I’ve used one with a manual override and it’s not as seamless as you’d hope. The lever is usually tiny and awkward - definitely not as smooth as a regular faucet. Also, retrofitting for hardwired models in older kitchens can get messy fast. Sometimes the cabinetry just doesn’t have space for the extra wiring, or you end up tearing into walls more than planned. If you’re worried about pets triggering it, some brands let you adjust sensor sensitivity, but it’s not foolproof. Batteries are annoying, but at least you don’t have to rework your whole setup.


Reply
hunter_frost

I get what you’re saying about the hassle with wiring, but honestly, I’d rather deal with a bit of a retrofit than keep swapping batteries. Feels wasteful, and those dead batteries always pile up. Manual levers aren’t perfect, sure, but I’ll take that over more landfill fodder any day. Does anyone else actually find battery changes as annoying as I do, or am I just too stubborn about e-waste?


Reply

Find a local plumber.

Loading local plumbers…

Scroll to Top