Notifications
Clear all

Touchless taps and other faucet surprises

65 Posts
63 Users
0 Reactions
444 Views
Posts: 2
(@thomasq67)
New Member
Joined:

I get what you mean about the “smart” upgrades sometimes being more hassle than they’re worth. I installed a touchless faucet in my kitchen last month, mostly because I thought it’d be more hygienic when handling raw meat. It’s definitely convenient, but I’ve noticed it’s super sensitive—sometimes just reaching for the soap sets it off. I did some reading and apparently the sensor placement makes a huge difference, but adjusting it isn’t always straightforward.

The battery issue is real too. I didn’t realize how often I’d need to swap them out, especially with kids constantly triggering the water. I’m curious if anyone’s tried the hardwired versions instead of battery-powered? Wondering if that solves some of these headaches or just introduces new ones...


Reply
Posts: 13
(@cosplayer58)
Active Member
Joined:

Touchless taps and other faucet surprises

Yeah, the sensitivity thing is a real pain. I put in a touchless faucet about a year ago, and it’s been a mixed bag. Like, it’s great when your hands are covered in dough or whatever, but I swear it goes off if you just look at it funny. My partner keeps bumping it while reaching for the sponge and suddenly there’s water everywhere. I tried fiddling with the sensor settings but honestly, it’s not super intuitive—ended up just living with it.

About the batteries: totally hear you. Ours chews through them way faster than I expected, especially when the kids are around (they think it’s hilarious to wave their hands under there just to see it turn on and off). I considered switching to a hardwired version but got a bit nervous about running electrical under the sink. Water and electricity together just makes me twitchy, even if it’s supposed to be safe. Plus, if you ever have to do plumbing work or swap out the faucet down the line, having that extra wiring seems like another headache.

One thing I did notice—some brands let you plug into an outlet instead of hardwiring directly, which feels a little safer and less permanent. But then you’ve got cords to deal with under your sink, which isn’t ideal either. Honestly, sometimes I miss the old-school lever faucet... at least you always know what you’re getting.

If you stick with battery-powered, using rechargeables helps a bit (at least you’re not burning through disposables), but yeah, nothing’s perfect. These “smart” upgrades always sound great until you’re crawling under the sink for the third time in a month swapping out batteries or trying to reset something that’s gone haywire.


Reply
golfplayer67
Posts: 1
(@golfplayer67)
New Member
Joined:

Honestly, I’ve been on the fence about these touchless faucets for exactly these reasons. The battery thing is what gets me—feels like I’m always buying AAAs for something, and now the sink wants in on the action? I tried rechargeables too, but they don’t seem to last as long between swaps. The idea of running a cord under the sink just makes me picture it getting tangled with cleaning supplies or worse, getting wet. Sometimes I wonder if all this “smart” stuff is just making life more complicated (and expensive) than it needs to be...


Reply
pate84
Posts: 1
(@pate84)
New Member
Joined:

The idea of running a cord under the sink just makes me picture it getting tangled with cleaning supplies or worse, getting wet.

That’s exactly what stopped me from putting one in our kitchen remodel last year. I kept imagining a leak or spill under the sink and then—zap—cord in the puddle. Maybe I’m overthinking it, but water and electricity in tight spaces just feels like asking for trouble. The battery thing’s annoying too. I tried a motion-sensor soap dispenser once and it ate through batteries way faster than I expected. Ended up going back to a regular pump.

I get why people like the convenience, but sometimes the old-school stuff is just simpler and safer. Less to break, less to maintain. I guess if you’re really into gadgets, it might be worth the hassle, but for me, I’d rather not add another thing that needs batteries or cords near water.


Reply
Posts: 4
(@bene51)
New Member
Joined:

I hear you on the battery drain. We had a touchless faucet in our last place, and it felt like I was always swapping out batteries—plus, the old ones just end up as more waste. Not exactly what I’d call eco-friendly. The other thing that bugged me was how sensitive the sensor could be. Sometimes it’d turn on if you just walked by, and other times you’d be waving your hands around like you’re trying to land a plane.

Honestly, I’ve found that a good old single-lever faucet is way easier to clean and lasts longer. Fewer moving parts, less plastic, and no weird wiring under the sink to worry about. I get the appeal of gadgets, but when it comes to water and electricity, I’d rather keep things simple. Plus, if something does break, it’s usually easier (and cheaper) to fix or replace the basic stuff. Maybe I’m just set in my ways, but I’d rather put that money toward a solid water filter or something that actually makes a difference.


Reply
Page 12 / 13
Share:
Scroll to Top