Notifications
Clear all

anyone tried sustainable plumbing upgrades at home?

348 Posts
335 Users
0 Reactions
5,073 Views
Posts: 9
(@nalahistorian)
Active Member
Joined:

That's a really good point—people often overlook the manufacturing and disposal side of these things. I know tankless heaters can last quite a bit longer than traditional tanks, which might help offset some of that initial impact...but I've never seen solid numbers comparing the two over their full lifecycle.

Makes me wonder about other plumbing upgrades too, like low-flow fixtures or greywater systems. Are those easier on the environment overall, considering their simpler manufacturing and lower maintenance? Might be worth checking out if we're looking at sustainability from all angles.


Reply
Posts: 11
(@dance169)
Active Member
Joined:

I've swapped out a few traditional tanks for tankless over the years, and yeah, they do seem to hold up better long-term. But honestly, I've never crunched the numbers on the full lifecycle either—would be interesting to see some real data on that.

As for low-flow fixtures, I've installed them in several properties. They're definitely simpler to put in and maintain compared to greywater setups. Greywater systems sound great in theory, but from what I've seen, they can get complicated fast—especially if you're retrofitting an older home. Permits, plumbing reroutes, and maintenance can add up quickly. Low-flow fixtures are pretty much plug-and-play and tenants rarely complain as long as the pressure stays decent.

I'm curious though...has anyone here actually run a greywater system long-term? Wondering if the environmental payoff is worth the extra hassle and upfront cost.


Reply
mpupper79
Posts: 10
(@mpupper79)
Active Member
Joined:

I've installed a couple greywater systems for clients over the years, and you're right—they can get tricky, especially retrofitting older homes. One client stuck with it long-term and seemed pretty satisfied, but they were also really committed to sustainability. Maintenance wasn't terrible, but definitely more involved than low-flow fixtures. Makes me wonder if rainwater harvesting might be a simpler middle-ground option...has anyone here tried that route instead?


Reply
Posts: 6
(@ocean268)
Active Member
Joined:

I've done rainwater harvesting at my place for a few years now, and honestly, it's way simpler than messing around with greywater systems—especially if you're retrofitting an older home. Setup wasn't too bad, just gutters, filters, and a decent storage tank. The biggest hassle was making sure the overflow was properly managed (learned that one the hard way after a heavy storm...). Overall though, it's been pretty low-maintenance and practical. Definitely recommend giving it a shot before diving into anything more complicated.


Reply
Posts: 8
(@cchef80)
Active Member
Joined:

Totally agree on rainwater harvesting being simpler—I did a basic DIY setup last year and it was surprisingly straightforward. One thing I'd add though, especially for anyone budget-conscious like me, is to really think about tank placement. I initially underestimated how heavy a full tank can get, and ended up needing to reinforce the base after the fact (not fun). Also, if you're in an area with freezing winters, you might want to consider insulating your pipes or planning for easy drainage before the cold hits. Learned that lesson when my pipes froze solid overnight...not my finest moment.

Greywater systems do intrigue me, but from what I've read, they seem to require more careful planning and maintenance. Has anyone here successfully set one up without spending a fortune or constantly fiddling with it? Curious if it's worth the effort or if rainwater really is the way to go for simplicity and cost savings.


Reply
Page 6 / 70
Share:
Scroll to Top