Notifications
Clear all

Rusty water heater woes—repair or replace?

339 Posts
320 Users
0 Reactions
1,701 Views
sonic_smith5342
Posts: 1
(@sonic_smith5342)
New Member
Joined:

Tankless definitely has its perks, but I'm not convinced it's always worth the extra hassle and cost. I've seen cases where folks upgraded their gas lines and still ran into issues with inconsistent water temps or maintenance headaches down the road. Sometimes a quality traditional tank replacement—especially newer, efficient models—can be simpler and cheaper overall. Just something to consider before diving into the tankless route...

Reply
zelda_king
Posts: 5
(@zelda_king)
Active Member
Joined:

Totally hear you on the tankless hesitation. I went through a similar thought process when my old water heater started showing signs of rust and leaking. Tankless sounded amazing at first—less energy use, endless hot showers—but once I dug into the details, things got complicated quickly.

First off, the gas line upgrade isn't always straightforward. Depending on your home's layout, this can mean some pretty serious extra costs and disruption. And even if you get past that initial hurdle, maintenance can be more frequent (and pricier) than a traditional unit. Annual descaling is recommended in many areas with hard water, and if you skip it or delay it too long, performance issues pop up faster than you'd think.

Another thing people often overlook: power outages. Traditional tanks hold a decent amount of hot water, so even if your electricity or gas is out briefly, you've still got some warm water stored up. With tankless? The moment your power goes out, you're stuck with cold showers until things come back online.

On the flip side—and just to be fair—tankless units really do cut down on energy waste significantly. If you're someone who travels often or has a smaller household that doesn't use much hot water daily, tankless can make sense from an eco standpoint. But for larger families with consistent usage patterns, the savings may not offset the upfront costs and ongoing maintenance hassles.

In the end, I went with a high-efficiency traditional tank replacement and haven't regretted it yet. Installation was straightforward, upkeep minimal, and my monthly bills still dropped noticeably compared to my old rusty dinosaur. Just wanted to share my experience in case it helps anyone else wrestling with this decision...

Reply
natetaylor302
Posts: 7
(@natetaylor302)
Active Member
Joined:

Went through almost the exact same debate a few months back when our heater started leaking rusty water all over the basement floor. I initially leaned tankless too, but after crunching numbers (and realizing we'd need a pricey electrical panel upgrade), we ended up going with a traditional high-efficiency tank. Honestly, it's been great so far—simple install, no headaches, and bills noticeably lower. Tankless seems awesome in theory, but the hidden costs and maintenance kinda killed it for me...

Reply
foodie40
Posts: 4
(@foodie40)
Active Member
Joined:

Had a similar experience last winter when our old heater started dripping rusty water everywhere. Initially, tankless seemed like the obvious upgrade—space-saving, endless hot water, all that good stuff. But after digging deeper, the upfront costs and maintenance schedule made me pause:

- Needed gas line upgrades (unexpected expense).
- Annual maintenance was more involved than I realized.
- Installation quotes were all over the place, making budgeting tricky.

Ended up going with a high-efficiency traditional tank instead. Honestly, zero regrets. Installation was straightforward, and our monthly bills dropped noticeably. Plus, no complicated maintenance schedules to worry about. Tankless definitely has its perks, but for our situation, the simpler solution turned out to be the smarter one.

Reply
editor71
Posts: 4
(@editor71)
Active Member
Joined:

"Ended up going with a high-efficiency traditional tank instead. Honestly, zero regrets."

Interesting take, but I gotta say, my experience was a bit different. Went tankless about three years ago, and yeah, the upfront cost stung a bit at first—especially after realizing we needed the gas line upgrade too (seems like that's a common surprise). But honestly, the maintenance hasn't been as bad as people make it out to be. Once a year flush, takes maybe an hour tops, and it's pretty straightforward once you've done it once or twice.

Also, the endless hot water thing isn't just marketing hype. We have teenagers at home, and trust me, no more cold showers after they've drained the tank is a game changer. Bills dropped noticeably too, though probably comparable to your high-efficiency tank.

Not knocking your choice—sounds like it worked out great—but I wouldn't dismiss tankless outright. It can still be worth it depending on your household size and water usage habits.

Reply
Page 21 / 68
Share:
Scroll to Top