Notifications
Clear all

drain inspection cams: wired vs wireless, what's your pick?

112 Posts
107 Users
0 Reactions
1,250 Views
podcaster38
Posts: 10
(@podcaster38)
Active Member
Joined:

I've used both wired and wireless cams over the years, and honestly, each has its own quirks. I get the appeal of wireless—no cables snagging or getting tangled up in tight spots—but have you thought about battery life? I had a wireless unit a couple years back, and while it was great for quick checks, the battery always seemed to die at the worst possible moment. Nothing like being halfway down a drain line and suddenly losing your feed...

On the other hand, wired cams can be a pain, no doubt about it. I remember one rental property I manage had this crazy maze of old cast iron pipes under the basement floor. Trying to maneuver a wired cam through that mess was like playing some twisted plumbing version of Tetris. But once it was in place, at least I didn't have to worry about signal drops or interference.

Speaking of interference—your buddy might be onto something with newer wireless models. I've heard similar things about improved signal strength and reliability lately. Still, I'd be curious how well they hold up in older buildings with thick concrete walls or metal piping everywhere. Has anyone else here tried one of these newer wireless setups in an older home? Did you notice any issues with signal strength or video quality?

Personally, I'm still sticking with my wired setup for now, mostly because it's already paid for itself several times over. But if I ever need to replace it, I'll definitely consider giving wireless another shot—assuming battery tech and signal reliability keep improving at this rate.

Reply
max_taylor
Posts: 4
(@max_taylor)
Active Member
Joined:

I've been helping out on a few older homes lately, and here's my quick take:

- Wireless is tempting, but battery life still makes me nervous. Losing feed mid-job sounds like a nightmare scenario.
- Wired cams are clunky, sure, but at least you know they'll stay powered and connected. Reliability matters, especially in tight or tricky spots.
- Haven't personally tested the newer wireless models yet, but I'd be cautious about interference in older buildings. Thick walls and metal pipes can really mess with signals...

For now, wired feels safer to me—maybe I'm just overly cautious though, haha.

Reply
alex_dreamer
Posts: 12
(@alex_dreamer)
Active Member
Joined:

Totally with you on this one.

"Wireless is tempting, but battery life still makes me nervous. Losing feed mid-job sounds like a nightmare scenario."

Exactly my worry too. As someone who just bought an older home, I've been dealing with all sorts of unexpected plumbing adventures lately... and trust me, the last thing you want when you're halfway down a drain line is your camera suddenly going dark because the battery decided to quit. Plus, older houses have so many hidden surprises—metal pipes, thick plaster walls, random wiring—that wireless signals can get pretty sketchy.

I know wired cams aren't exactly convenient (dragging cables around isn't fun), but at least you can count on them to stay powered and connected. Reliability is key when you're trying to diagnose a plumbing issue before it turns into something expensive or dangerous. Maybe I'm overly cautious too, but I'd rather deal with a bit of hassle upfront than risk missing something important down the line...

Reply
ryanj59
Posts: 11
(@ryanj59)
Active Member
Joined:

I get the hesitation about wireless, especially with battery life. Had a similar experience last year when I was helping a buddy inspect his septic line. We borrowed a wireless cam thinking it'd be easier to maneuver, but halfway through the inspection, the battery indicator started flashing red. Talk about stress... we barely got it out before it died completely. After that, I switched back to wired and haven't looked back since.

Sure, cables can be annoying, but at least you know you're not racing against the clock. Plus, I've noticed wireless signals can struggle in certain setups—especially if you're dealing with older cast iron pipes or thick concrete foundations. Wired cams might feel a bit old-school, but reliability wins every time for me. I'd rather deal with some cable tangles than risk missing something critical mid-inspection.

Reply
photo95
Posts: 12
(@photo95)
Active Member
Joined:

"Sure, cables can be annoying, but at least you know you're not racing against the clock."

Haha, yep, been there! I tried wireless once when checking out a stubborn clog in my basement drain. Thought I'd save myself some hassle... until the signal started cutting out every few seconds. Ended up doing this weird dance around the basement trying to find the sweet spot for reception—probably looked ridiculous. 😅

Switched back to wired after that fiasco. Sure, it's a bit clunky dragging cables around corners and through tight spots, but at least I can trust it to get the job done without drama. Wireless tech is great for some things, but when it comes to inspections, I'll take reliability over convenience any day.

Reply
Page 19 / 23
Share:
Scroll to Top