Notifications
Clear all

just dealt with a gas leak scare—anyone else used those home detectors?

198 Posts
184 Users
0 Reactions
22.6 K Views
Posts: 11
(@psychology_tigger)
Active Member
Joined:

Had a similar experience myself, though mine was with a carbon monoxide detector rather than gas. It went off randomly one evening, and I spent a good half-hour anxiously checking everything before realizing it was just a low battery warning. Definitely agree that regular maintenance is key—it's easy to overlook detectors when you're busy with other household chores.

One thing I'd add from an eco-friendly perspective: when you're doing those regular checks and cleanings, it's worth considering rechargeable batteries. I've switched to them for most of my detectors and small electronics around the house. They're not only better for the environment (less waste), but they also save you money in the long run. Just make sure you get good-quality rechargeable batteries designed for long-term use in detectors, as some cheaper ones don't hold their charge as reliably.

Also, if anyone's looking into getting new detectors, there are some models now that combine smoke, carbon monoxide, and gas detection into one unit. They're pricier upfront, but they simplify maintenance and reduce clutter—fewer devices means fewer batteries to check and replace. Plus, fewer devices manufactured means less environmental impact overall.

Glad your scare turned out to be nothing serious. Moments like these can be stressful, but they're also valuable reminders to stay proactive about home safety.


Reply
frodoshadow400
Posts: 21
(@frodoshadow400)
Eminent Member
Joined:

"when you're doing those regular checks and cleanings, it's worth considering rechargeable batteries."

I get the eco-friendly angle, but honestly, I'd be cautious about using rechargeables in safety detectors. From my experience, even good-quality rechargeables can lose charge unpredictably over time, especially in devices that sit idle for months. Personally, I stick with high-quality alkaline batteries for detectors—peace of mind is worth the extra waste in this case. Just my two cents...


Reply
donnaleaf176
Posts: 18
(@donnaleaf176)
Active Member
Joined:

From my experience, even good-quality rechargeables can lose charge unpredictably over time, especially in devices that sit idle for months.

Yeah, I get your point about rechargeables. I've tried them in smoke detectors before, and honestly, it was a bit hit-or-miss. They'd seem fine at first, but then randomly start chirping at 3 am because the voltage dropped slightly below the detector's threshold. Not fun... Now I just stick to lithium batteries—they cost a bit more upfront but last way longer and hold their charge reliably. Worth it for fewer midnight wake-ups, imo.


Reply
calligrapher77
Posts: 17
(@calligrapher77)
Active Member
Joined:

I've had mixed luck with lithium batteries myself. Sure, they hold charge longer, but I've noticed when they finally do die, it's often without much warning—no chirping, just silence. Had a tenant once who didn't realize their detector was dead for weeks because of that. Personally, I prefer sticking with regular alkalines and just scheduling battery swaps twice a year. A bit old-school maybe, but at least I know exactly when they're fresh... peace of mind counts for something.


Reply
Posts: 16
(@running_sarah)
Eminent Member
Joined:

I've had decent luck with lithium batteries, but I totally get your point about the sudden death issue. A few things I've noticed:

- Lithium cells do last longer overall, but yeah, they tend to go from "fine" to "dead" without much heads-up.
- Alkalines are cheaper upfront and easier to budget for regular replacements—twice a year is simple enough.
- Personally, I compromise: lithium in hard-to-reach detectors (vaulted ceilings, anyone?), alkalines everywhere else.

Keeps my wallet happy and my ladder time minimal...mostly.


Reply
Page 38 / 40
Share:
Scroll to Top