Interesting points. I've been leaning toward composting toilets for the eco benefits, but hadn't really thought about the upfront costs or retrofitting issues.
"Composting setups can get pricey upfront, especially if you're retrofitting an older home."
Do you think it's worth the extra hassle and expense long-term, or would low-flow toilets be enough environmentally? Still figuring this stuff out...
Composting toilets are great eco-wise, but honestly, low-flow toilets might hit that sweet spot between cost and sustainability. Retrofitting older homes can turn into a rabbit hole real quick...been there myself and my wallet's still recovering, lol.
Yeah, low-flow toilets seem more practical overall, but do they actually save enough water to justify the upfront costs? I'm still skeptical after hearing mixed experiences...and composting toilets just seem like too much hassle for everyday use.
I've installed a couple low-flow toilets myself, and honestly, the savings do add up quicker than you'd think. Sure, upfront costs can sting a bit, but if you crunch the numbers—especially if your area's water rates are climbing—it starts making sense within a year or two. Composting toilets...yeah, they're definitely more involved. But if you're open to alternatives, dual-flush toilets might hit that sweet spot between practicality and water savings without the composting hassle. Just something else to consider.
Good points about dual-flush toilets—I've found they're usually a solid compromise. I was initially skeptical about low-flow models myself, worrying they'd lack flushing power, but after installing one in our guest bathroom, I admit it's performing better than expected. Composting setups, though... they're definitely a commitment. Not sure I'd want to dive into that personally, but kudos to anyone willing to take that route. Your numbers on water savings match up with what I've seen too, so that's reassuring.
