Notifications
Clear all

anyone tried sustainable plumbing upgrades at home?

486 Posts
461 Users
0 Reactions
34.1 K Views
astronomy_zelda
Posts: 7
(@astronomy_zelda)
Active Member
Joined:

Title: Sustainable Plumbing Upgrades—PEX vs Copper Thoughts

Sometimes I wonder if the “less prone to buildup” thing is a bit overhyped for most homes unless your water’s really hard.

- Totally get what you mean about PEX being easier to work with. I watched my plumber snake it through places I didn’t even know existed in my walls.
- As a first-timer, I went with copper for the main lines just because I kept reading about “peace of mind” and, honestly, I’m a worrier. Fire safety, rodents, weird chemical reactions... copper just felt safer.
- That said, I did use PEX for a couple of runs to the bathrooms. It was way cheaper and the install was quick. But I keep checking for leaks like it’s a new hobby.
- About the mineral buildup—my water’s not super hard, so I haven’t noticed much difference. Maybe if you’re in a place with crazy hard water, it matters more?
- One thing I didn’t expect: the PEX lines are quieter. No more “water hammer” noises at 2am. Small win.

Still not sure if I made the “sustainable” choice, but at least nothing’s flooded yet... knock on wood.


Reply
Posts: 7
(@mobile_mario8483)
Active Member
Joined:

Copper definitely feels more “set it and forget it,” especially if you’re the type to worry about long-term issues. I did notice, though, that PEX is way less noisy—like you said, water hammer is basically gone. One thing I’d add: if you’ve got a lot of sun exposure in your attic or crawlspace, PEX can degrade over time unless it’s UV-protected. Not a huge deal if it’s all inside walls, but something to keep in mind. I’m still on the fence about which is more sustainable—copper’s recyclable, but mining isn’t exactly green, and PEX is plastic, so… trade-offs everywhere.


Reply
max_rebel
Posts: 9
(@max_rebel)
Active Member
Joined:

Honestly, I’ve seen copper fail from pinhole leaks way sooner than people expect, especially in areas with aggressive water. PEX can be a gamble with rodents, but if it’s protected and installed right, it’s pretty resilient. Sustainability-wise, both have their issues, but I’d argue longevity matters more than just the material itself. If you’re ripping out and replacing every 15 years, that’s not exactly green either.


Reply
Posts: 14
(@mcarter86)
Active Member
Joined:

If you’re ripping out and replacing every 15 years, that’s not exactly green either.

That’s the part that gets me—longevity is such a huge factor in sustainability, but it rarely gets enough attention. I’ve actually had to replace a section of copper after just 12 years due to pinhole leaks (high chloramine levels here). Kind of frustrating when you expect it to last decades. Has anyone looked into recycled-content PEX or even stainless steel flex lines for longer runs? I keep wondering if the embodied energy in stainless offsets its durability.


Reply
Posts: 6
(@pets_summit2262)
Active Member
Joined:

I’ve actually had to replace a section of copper after just 12 years due to pinhole leaks (high chloramine levels here). Kind of frustrating when you expect it to last decades.

Tell me about it. I swapped out a bunch of copper for PEX after my third pinhole leak—felt like I was doing more plumbing than actual living. Honestly, stainless flex is great, but getting it in long runs can be pricey and a pain to maneuver. Not sure if the energy trade-off is worth it, but at least I’m not crawling under the house every few years... which is its own kind of “green.”


Reply
Page 81 / 97
Share:
Scroll to Top