Plumbing discussions and local services.

anyone tried sustainable plumbing upgrades at home?

485 replies 67.8 K views
 
space389
5 posts

Aerators are a no-brainer, sure, but if you want real water savings, toilets and showerheads move the needle way more.

I’ve swapped out a ton of old showerheads for low-flow ones - some folks complain about pressure, but the decent brands barely feel different. Dual-flush toilets can be hit or miss though. Had one install where the gasket just wouldn’t seal right, no matter how careful I was. Sometimes the “old flapper” is actually easier to deal with... depends on the house.


Reply
melissaanimator5873
12 posts

I’ve had similar luck with low-flow showerheads - some tenants notice, most don’t. The trick seems to be avoiding the absolute cheapest models. Toilets are a different beast. I tried dual-flush in one older unit and ended up with constant calls about leaks or phantom flushes. Sometimes I wonder if the water savings are worth the maintenance headaches, especially in places with old plumbing. Anyone else find that newer tech doesn’t always play nice with 60s-era pipes?


Reply
aviation366
10 posts

Honestly, I tried swapping in a dual-flush toilet when I moved in, thinking I’d be saving the planet and my wallet. Ended up with more clogs than savings - old pipes just don’t seem to cooperate. Low-flow showerhead was fine, but toilets? Regret.


Reply
8 posts

Yeah, dual-flush toilets can be a gamble in older places. Here’s what I see a lot:

- Old cast iron or narrow pipes just don’t move the “goods” with less water. You end up plunging more than you’re flushing.
- Some of those early low-flow models were notorious for weak flushes. Newer ones are better, but still... if your plumbing’s from the ‘60s or earlier, it’s hit or miss.
- Sometimes people swap the toilet but forget about venting or slope issues in the drain line. Not enough pitch = stuff gets stuck, no matter how fancy the toilet is.

Honestly, I’ve seen folks go back to regular toilets after a year of frustration. Low-flow showerheads are usually fine since pressure’s not as big a deal there. Toilets, though? If your pipes are cranky, sometimes old-school just works better.

If you’re set on saving water, there are a few high-efficiency models that actually work decently with older plumbing, but they’re not all created equal. And yeah, sometimes you just gotta pick your battles - nobody wants to be on first-name terms with their plunger...


Reply
jhiker13
14 posts

If your pipes are cranky, sometimes old-school just works better.

That’s been my experience too, honestly. I tried a dual-flush in my ‘70s house and it was a constant battle - felt like I was saving water just to waste it plunging all the time. Ended up switching back, but kept the low-flow showerhead and aerators. Has anyone here had luck with greywater systems or rain barrels for indoor use? Curious if that’s less hassle than messing with old pipes.


Reply

Join the conversation

Share your experience or ask a follow-up question.

Scroll to Top