Notifications
Clear all

Saving water in the shower actually worked for me

486 Posts
467 Users
0 Reactions
24.3 K Views
karenbirdwatcher1684
Posts: 8
(@karenbirdwatcher1684)
Active Member
Joined:

- Totally agree on the silicone spray tips—makes cleaning way less of a hassle, especially with hard water.
- GPM rating is huge. I once swapped in a 1.25 GPM head thinking I’d save a ton, but with my old pipes and meh pressure, it was basically a trickle. Ended up going back to a 1.8 GPM and it’s a good balance between saving water and actually getting soap out of my hair.
- Another thing that helped: I run a little vinegar through the showerhead every few months. Just unscrew it, soak it for a bit, and most of the buildup comes right off. Not perfect, but it keeps things flowing.
- Some of those “water-saving” models are just too aggressive. If you’ve got low pressure already, they’re more frustrating than helpful.
- Honestly, sometimes the best fix is just finding a model that matches your setup instead of chasing the lowest GPM number. Learned that after a few cold, sad showers myself...


Reply
rwoof60
Posts: 17
(@rwoof60)
Active Member
Joined:

Honestly, sometimes the best fix is just finding a model that matches your setup instead of chasing the lowest GPM number. Learned that after a few cold, sad showers myself...

Couldn’t agree more—matching the showerhead to your water pressure makes a huge difference. I’ve also noticed some brands exaggerate their “pressure boosting” claims. If you’re dealing with old plumbing, those promises usually fall flat. One thing I’d add: check for flow restrictors inside the head. Sometimes removing or adjusting them (if local codes allow) can help if you’re stuck with really low pressure. Just don’t go too far or you’ll end up wasting more water than you save.


Reply
mindfulness865
Posts: 6
(@mindfulness865)
Active Member
Joined:

I get where you’re coming from about removing flow restrictors, but I’ve seen that go sideways more than once. Had a client who took his out to “fix” the pressure, and next thing you know, he’s got leaks in the wall because the old pipes couldn’t handle the extra flow. Sometimes those restrictors are there for a reason, especially in older houses. I’d rather swap out for a quality low-flow head that’s designed for low pressure than risk messing with the plumbing. Just my two cents—sometimes shortcuts end up costing more in the long run.


Reply
Posts: 14
(@writer62)
Active Member
Joined:

Yeah, I’ve always wondered about those restrictors—like, are they just a pain or actually necessary? I get the urge to yank them out when the shower feels more like a drizzle than a rinse, but then again, old plumbing is its own beast. My neighbor tried the “quick fix” route and ended up with a ceiling stain that looked suspiciously like Australia. Not fun.

I’m curious though—has anyone actually noticed a big difference with those low-flow heads? I swapped mine out for one that claimed “spa-like pressure,” but honestly, it felt more like a polite mist. Maybe I just picked a dud. Is there a brand or style that actually balances saving water and not making you freeze while rinsing shampoo? Or is it just trial and error until you find something that works for your pipes?


Reply
karen_dreamer
Posts: 2
(@karen_dreamer)
New Member
Joined:

I swapped mine out for one that claimed “spa-like pressure,” but honestly, it felt more like a polite mist.

Had to laugh at the “polite mist” description—been there. I used to think all low-flow heads were just a scam, but after a couple of trial runs, I landed on a Speakman model (the Anystream one). It’s got adjustable settings and actually rinses shampoo instead of just moving it around. Here’s my step-by-step: 1) Avoid the $10 hardware store specials—they’re usually the worst offenders for drizzle mode. 2) Check your water pressure first; anything under 40 psi and even a good head will struggle. 3) If you’re dealing with ancient pipes, sometimes a restrictor just makes things worse, but yanking it out can come back to bite you (hello, leaks). For me, it was about finding one with pressure-boosting tech, not just “low flow.” Worth the extra twenty bucks.


Reply
Page 46 / 98
Share:
Scroll to Top