Notifications
Clear all

Saving water in the shower actually worked for me

486 Posts
467 Users
0 Reactions
27.8 K Views
adventure811
Posts: 2
(@adventure811)
New Member
Joined:

I totally get where you’re coming from. I’ve tried a couple of low-flow showerheads over the years, and some were honestly just weak. But then I found one with a pressure-compensating valve—made a big difference. It’s not exactly like a high-flow model, but it’s close enough that I don’t notice much unless I’m in a rush. Have you checked the gallons per minute rating on the ones you’ve used? Some “low-flow” heads are 2.5 GPM, others drop to 1.5 or even lower, and that can really affect performance, especially with longer hair. Maybe it’s less about the concept and more about finding the right design?


Reply
sophiedreamer335
Posts: 16
(@sophiedreamer335)
Active Member
Joined:

I’ve always been a bit skeptical about those “eco” showerheads. Tried a couple that were supposed to save water, but honestly, the experience was pretty underwhelming—felt like I was just standing under a leaky faucet. The pressure-compensating valve thing is interesting though. Never really paid much attention to the GPM ratings, just went with whatever was on sale or had decent reviews. Maybe that’s where I went wrong.

One thing I’ve noticed is that some brands hype up their “spa-like” spray, but it ends up being a super fine mist that doesn’t actually rinse shampoo out of thick hair. Not sure if it’s just marketing or if there’s a real difference in nozzle design. Have you actually measured your water savings, or is it more of a “feels like I’m using less” situation? I get the appeal of cutting down on bills, but if it takes twice as long to rinse off, are we really saving anything?

Curious if anyone’s tried those models with adjustable settings—like a strong pulse for rinsing and a gentler spray for everything else. Wondering if that’s the sweet spot between saving water and not feeling like you’re sacrificing comfort.


Reply
Posts: 9
(@drones739)
Active Member
Joined:

I hear you on the “eco” showerheads—some of them are just sad, like you’re showering under a drizzle. I’ve tried a few with adjustable settings, and honestly, the only ones that worked for me had a legit “massage” or “power” mode. The fine mist ones are useless if you’ve got thick hair or just want to feel clean. I think nozzle design matters way more than the GPM rating alone. As for water savings, I haven’t measured exact numbers, but if I’m standing there twice as long trying to rinse off, it feels like a wash (pun intended). The adjustable ones seem to hit the sweet spot, but it’s still trial and error.


Reply
peanut_joker
Posts: 10
(@peanut_joker)
Active Member
Joined:

Tried one of those ultra-low flow heads once—never again. Felt like I was just getting misted, not actually rinsing off. Ended up swapping it for an adjustable one with a stronger spray. Noticed less water use, but at least I don’t have to stand there forever. Definitely agree, nozzle design makes a huge difference.


Reply
Posts: 9
(@culture273)
Active Member
Joined:

Yeah, nozzle design is everything. I’ve swapped out a bunch of shower heads for folks, and honestly, the ultra-low flow ones can be hit or miss. Some just don’t have enough pressure to actually rinse soap off—feels like standing in a fog. The adjustable ones with different spray patterns seem to strike a better balance. If you’re looking to save water but still want a decent shower, I’d say go for one with a flow restrictor you can remove or adjust. Sometimes it’s just about finding the right combo for your plumbing setup... not all pipes are created equal.


Reply
Page 41 / 98
Share:
Scroll to Top