Notifications
Clear all

Low-flow toilets: worth the hype or just a pain?

234 Posts
229 Users
0 Reactions
10.4 K Views
breezee33
Posts: 11
(@breezee33)
Active Member
Joined:

Honestly, I still miss the old-school toilets that could flush a small army if needed. The low-flows do save water, but I swear I spend more time fiddling with parts than actually using the thing. Not sure the trade-off is always worth it...


Reply
editor74
Posts: 7
(@editor74)
Active Member
Joined:

Low-flow toilets: worth the hype or just a pain?

I hear you on the old-school tanks. Those things were like the muscle cars of plumbing—loud, proud, and could handle pretty much anything. I swapped out my ‘90s throne for a low-flow model last year, thinking I’d be saving the planet and my water bill at the same time. Here’s how that went:

Step 1: Install new toilet. Admire shiny porcelain.
Step 2: Realize it takes two flushes to clear anything more than a tissue. Start questioning life choices.
Step 3: Google “how to adjust low-flow toilet,” then spend an afternoon fiddling with float valves and flappers.
Step 4: Celebrate minor victory when it finally flushes right... until it clogs the next week.

I get the water-saving angle, but if you’re plunging every other day or replacing parts constantly, it starts to feel like a weird trade-off. Maybe there’s some magical brand out there that actually works as advertised, but I haven’t found it yet. Still, my water bill did go down a bit, so I guess that’s something...


Reply
Posts: 12
(@andrew_garcia)
Active Member
Joined:

I hear you on the plunging—been there way too often since switching to low-flow. My water bill dropped a bit too, but I’m not convinced it’s worth the hassle. Has anyone found a model that actually works well without constant tweaking?


Reply
ztail12
Posts: 12
(@ztail12)
Active Member
Joined:

My water bill dropped a bit too, but I’m not convinced it’s worth the hassle.

Yeah, I get that. The savings are nice, but honestly, some of these low-flow toilets just don't cut it. I had one that needed two flushes half the time—kind of defeats the purpose, right? Ended up switching to a pressure-assisted model (Sloan), and it's way better. Still uses less water, but I’m not plunging every week now. Not perfect, but definitely less annoying than the first one I tried.


Reply
politics909
Posts: 6
(@politics909)
Active Member
Joined:

I hear you on the double-flushing—been there myself. Some of the early low-flow models just didn’t have the power. I swapped mine for a Toto Drake, and it’s been solid. Not pressure-assisted, but the flush is strong enough that I rarely have issues. It’s all about picking the right model, I guess.


Reply
Page 37 / 47
Share:
Scroll to Top