Notifications
Clear all

Low-flow toilets: worth the hype or just a pain?

234 Posts
229 Users
0 Reactions
13 K Views
poet15
Posts: 9
(@poet15)
Active Member
Joined:

Low-flow toilets: worth the hype or just a pain?

I totally get what you mean about the old toilets working better with old pipes. We swapped out our main bathroom toilet for a low-flow one last year because, you know, water bills... but honestly, it’s been kind of a mixed bag. The thing does save water, sure, but I’ve had to plunge it way more than the old one. And our house is from the 60s, so the pipes aren’t exactly new either.

It’s weird, because in the guest bathroom (which has newer plumbing), the same model works fine. Makes me wonder if it’s really the toilet or just the pipes that are the issue. I keep thinking maybe I should’ve just waited until we could redo the plumbing, but at the time, it felt like an easy way to save some cash. Now I’m not so sure it was worth the hassle.

Anyway, I guess it’s not always a one-size-fits-all thing. Sometimes “upgrading” just means trading one problem for another...


Reply
food823
Posts: 9
(@food823)
Active Member
Joined:

Sometimes “upgrading” just means trading one problem for another...

That’s the story of my life—fix one thing, break another. I swapped to low-flow too and yeah, saves water, but now I’m best friends with my plunger. Maybe it’s just old house quirks? At least the water bill’s happier.


Reply
Posts: 2
(@michelleskier4165)
New Member
Joined:

I hear you on the plunger situation. Sometimes it’s not just the toilet but the old pipes that can’t handle the lower flow. Did you check if your drains are clear? I’ve seen a few cases where a quick snaking made a big difference. Wonder if it’s more about the plumbing than the toilet itself...


Reply
aspenscott497
Posts: 18
(@aspenscott497)
Active Member
Joined:

Yeah, the pipe situation is a whole other can of worms, isn’t it? I thought swapping in a low-flow would magically lower my water bill, but now I’m learning way more about my 70s-era plumbing than I ever wanted. Snaked the main drain and found some, uh, “vintage” gunk in there. Still feels like the toilet needs a double flush more often than not. Maybe the combo just isn’t great—old pipes and new toilets don’t always play nice together.


Reply
cooper_lee
Posts: 6
(@cooper_lee)
Active Member
Joined:

Still feels like the toilet needs a double flush more often than not. Maybe the combo just isn’t great—old pipes and new toilets don’t always play nice together.

I get where you’re coming from, but I’ve actually seen old pipes and low-flows work together better than most folks expect, as long as a couple things are checked:

- If you’re finding “vintage” gunk in the main, there’s probably more buildup further down. Even after snaking, some of that crud can slow things up, especially with less water pushing it along.
- Double flushing shouldn’t be the norm. Sometimes it’s not just the pipes—it could be the model of low-flow. Some of them just aren’t designed well for solids, especially older low-flows from the early 2000s.
- I’ve swapped in newer 1.28 GPF toilets on 60s and 70s lines with no issues after a good power flush of the drain lines. Not saying it’s always magic, but sometimes it’s more about what’s hiding in those pipes than the toilet itself.

Honestly, if you’re still seeing slow drains or double flushes after cleaning things out, might be worth checking venting or even a partial clog further down. The “old pipes + new toilet” mix isn’t always doomed—sometimes it just takes a little extra prep work.


Reply
Page 16 / 47
Share:
Scroll to Top