Notifications
Clear all

Plumbing pros weigh in: new app promises faster fixes and fewer headaches

595 Posts
547 Users
0 Reactions
32.3 K Views
josephg31
Posts: 8
(@josephg31)
Active Member
Joined:

I get where you’re coming from—sometimes the simplest tools just work. But I do think there’s something to be said for the newer tech, especially if you’re trying to cut down on water waste or catch leaks before they become a real problem. I tried one of those app-connected sensors last year after a pipe burst in my crawlspace (total nightmare), and it actually let me shut off the water remotely while I was out. Yeah, it’s more upfront, but I figure the savings in repairs and wasted water might balance out over time. The cat water thing is annoying, though... maybe there’s a way to tweak the sensitivity?


Reply
literature306
Posts: 4
(@literature306)
New Member
Joined:

That’s wild about the pipe burst—those things always seem to happen at the worst possible time. I’m curious, did you have any trouble with false alarms from the sensor, or was it pretty reliable? The cat water issue is a real thing; I’ve seen people tape a little shield over the sensor or move the bowl, but that’s not always practical. Some brands let you adjust the sensitivity in the app settings—did yours have that option, or is it more of a set-it-and-forget-it type? Sometimes the tech is great, but I do wonder if it’s overkill for smaller spaces or apartments.


Reply
Posts: 6
(@melissachef)
Active Member
Joined:

Sometimes the tech is great, but I do wonder if it’s overkill for smaller spaces or apartments.

I get where you’re coming from, but honestly, I think even in a small apartment, one leak can cause a ton of damage—especially if you’re on an upper floor. I’d rather have a few false alarms than deal with water dripping into my neighbor’s place. The sensor I tried was pretty sensitive, but the app let me tweak the threshold a bit. Still had to move the cat bowl though... not ideal, but better than risking a flood. Maybe it’s a bit much for some folks, but for peace of mind, I’ll take it.


Reply
duke_frost
Posts: 18
(@duke_frost)
Active Member
Joined:

I’ve had a few close calls over the years—one tiny leak under a kitchen sink turned into a nightmare for the folks below. Even in smaller units, water finds its way into the weirdest places. I do wonder, though, how many people actually keep up with these sensors after the first few months? I’ve seen tenants unplug stuff or just ignore the alerts because they get tired of false alarms. Is there a way to make these systems more foolproof, or is it always going to be a bit of a trade-off between convenience and safety? I’m all for tech that helps avoid insurance claims, but sometimes I wonder if we’re relying too much on gadgets instead of regular checks. Anyone else ever have to deal with tenants disabling this kind of thing, or is that just my luck?


Reply
cars925
Posts: 6
(@cars925)
Active Member
Joined:

You’re definitely not alone—false alarms can be a real pain, especially for people who aren’t super into “smart home” stuff. I set up a couple of leak sensors last year when I moved in, and honestly, after getting a few random chirps at 2 a.m., I almost ripped them out myself. The thing is, a lot of these sensors rely on Wi-Fi or batteries, and if either goes, you’re left with a useless gadget. Plus, if the app notifications aren’t set up right, it’s easy to ignore them or get annoyed.

One thing I found helpful was getting sensors that can integrate with my home automation system, so they’ll send alerts to my phone, but also trigger a siren or even shut off the water automatically if something serious happens. That way, it’s not just a random beep you can ignore. I still check under the sinks every few weeks, though. I don’t think tech totally replaces just poking around with a flashlight now and then. There’s always going to be a bit of a trade-off, but I’d rather have too many warnings than come home to a soggy kitchen.


Reply
Page 105 / 119
Share:
Scroll to Top